The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20427, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20427 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20427 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20427. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 205 health care providers accessible to residents in 20427, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20427, Washington, District of Columbia
| Asthma Score | 63 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 99 |
| Hospital Score | 53 |
| Travel Score | 58 |
| 20427 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20427) and Primary Care Availability
Analyzing asthma care within the specific confines of ZIP code 20427 in Washington, D.C., and comparing it to the broader landscape of primary care availability across the city requires a nuanced approach. An “Asthma Score,” in this context, would encompass several factors beyond simple metrics. It would consider the accessibility of specialists, the integration of mental health support, the adoption of telemedicine, and the overall patient-physician ratio. This analysis seeks to provide a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the healthcare ecosystem.
Focusing on 20427, a ZIP code that encompasses significant federal government presence and potentially a diverse population, the availability of primary care physicians becomes a crucial starting point. The physician-to-patient ratio within this specific area needs careful examination. Data from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and local healthcare networks would be essential to establish a baseline. This ratio directly impacts appointment wait times, the ability to establish strong patient-physician relationships, and the overall quality of care. Areas with a lower physician-to-patient ratio generally offer better access and potentially improved asthma management outcomes.
Beyond the raw numbers, the presence of specialized asthma care within 20427 is critical. Are there pulmonologists and allergists readily accessible? Do they have experience treating complex asthma cases? Proximity to major hospitals and medical centers, such as those within the broader Washington, D.C. area, can significantly influence access to advanced diagnostic tools and specialized treatments. The Asthma Score would need to reflect the availability of these specialists and the ease with which patients can access them.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is another vital component. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact mental well-being. Anxiety and depression are frequently co-occurring conditions. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, such as on-site therapists or readily available referrals, would receive higher scores. This integration recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental health and provides a more holistic approach to patient care.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in the Asthma Score. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide medication refills electronically can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited access to in-person appointments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies would be viewed favorably, demonstrating a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care.
Evaluating the standout practices within 20427 requires a deeper dive into their specific offerings. Do they have dedicated asthma education programs? Do they offer personalized asthma action plans? Do they actively participate in asthma research or clinical trials? Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, proactive management, and continuous improvement would be considered leaders in asthma care. Examining patient satisfaction surveys and reviews would also provide valuable insights into the quality of care provided.
The broader context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C., provides a crucial framework for understanding the challenges and opportunities within 20427. The city’s overall physician-to-patient ratio, the distribution of primary care practices across different neighborhoods, and the availability of resources for underserved populations all play a role. Comparing the healthcare landscape within 20427 to the city-wide averages can reveal disparities and highlight areas that require focused attention.
Furthermore, examining the policies and initiatives of the District of Columbia Department of Health is essential. Are there programs aimed at improving asthma management, such as school-based asthma programs or community outreach initiatives? The presence of these programs would positively influence the Asthma Score, reflecting a broader commitment to public health and asthma prevention.
Analyzing the insurance landscape within 20427 and the broader Washington, D.C. area is also critical. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, and the availability of affordable healthcare options directly impact access to care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer financial assistance programs would receive higher scores, reflecting a commitment to serving a diverse patient population.
In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for 20427 and comparing it to primary care availability in Washington, D.C., requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. These include physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialists, the integration of mental health resources, the adoption of telemedicine, and the policies and initiatives of the local health authorities. The goal is to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately leading to better asthma management and improved patient outcomes.
Would you like to visualize this data geographically? Explore the healthcare landscape of Washington, D.C., with interactive maps from CartoChrome. Uncover insights into physician distribution, access to specialists, and other critical factors influencing asthma care.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
