30067, Marietta, Georgia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30067, Marietta, Georgia is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.02 percent of the residents in 30067 has some form of health insurance. 22.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.59 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30067 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 10,851 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 32 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30067. An estimate of 16 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,362 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 68,635 health care providers accessible to residents in 30067, Marietta, Georgia.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts communities, necessitating accessible and effective healthcare. This analysis focuses on asthma care within ZIP Code 30067 (Marietta, Georgia), assessing physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in the local healthcare landscape.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of accessibility. While precise numbers fluctuate, the general trend in 30067 suggests a moderate physician density, particularly for primary care physicians (PCPs). This means that while access to a PCP is generally available, appointment wait times can vary. Specialists, particularly pulmonologists, who are critical for asthma management, may have longer wait times, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. The 'Asthma Score' reflects this by assigning a moderate rating for PCP availability and a slightly lower rating for specialist access.

Primary care practices in Marietta display a range of characteristics. Some practices are part of larger healthcare systems, offering a broader network of specialists and resources. Others are smaller, independent practices, often providing more personalized care. The 'Asthma Score' considers the presence of these different models, noting the benefits of both. Larger systems may offer more comprehensive asthma management programs, including education and support groups. Smaller practices may foster stronger patient-physician relationships, leading to better adherence to treatment plans. The score balances these considerations.

Standout practices are those that demonstrate a commitment to asthma-specific care. This includes practices with dedicated asthma educators, readily available peak flow meters, and well-defined asthma action plans. These practices often prioritize patient education, empowering individuals to manage their condition effectively. The 'Asthma Score' identifies these practices based on publicly available information, patient reviews, and potentially, direct outreach to practices. Practices with strong asthma management programs receive a higher rating, contributing positively to the overall score.

Telemedicine adoption is a growing trend in healthcare, particularly beneficial for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication refills, and symptom monitoring, improving access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in underserved areas. The 'Asthma Score' evaluates the extent of telemedicine adoption among practices in 30067. Practices offering telehealth options receive a higher rating, reflecting their commitment to innovative care delivery. The score also considers the ease of use and accessibility of telemedicine platforms.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are critical. Asthma can be a significant source of stress and anxiety, and these mental health challenges can exacerbate asthma symptoms. The 'Asthma Score' assesses the availability of mental health support within primary care practices and the broader community. Practices that offer on-site counseling or readily refer patients to mental health professionals receive a higher rating. The score also considers the availability of community resources, such as support groups and mental health clinics.

The 'Asthma Score' also considers the availability of after-hours care. Asthma symptoms can worsen at any time, and access to timely care is crucial. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, or on-call services receive a higher rating. This ensures that patients have access to care when they need it most, reducing the likelihood of emergency room visits. The score also considers the availability of urgent care centers in the area, providing additional options for after-hours care.

Medication access is another important factor. The 'Asthma Score' considers the proximity of pharmacies to primary care practices and the availability of affordable medications. Practices that work with pharmacies to ensure patients can access their medications easily receive a higher rating. The score also considers the availability of patient assistance programs for those who cannot afford their medications.

Patient education is a cornerstone of effective asthma management. The 'Asthma Score' evaluates the quality and availability of patient education materials and programs. Practices that offer comprehensive education on asthma triggers, medication use, and symptom management receive a higher rating. The score also considers the use of educational tools, such as videos, brochures, and online resources.

Community involvement is another factor considered. Practices that actively participate in community health initiatives, such as asthma awareness campaigns and screenings, receive a higher rating. The 'Asthma Score' also considers the involvement of local hospitals and clinics in asthma care.

The overall 'Asthma Score' for 30067 is a composite of these factors. It is a dynamic assessment, subject to change as healthcare practices evolve. While a precise numerical score is not provided here, the analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in the area. The score highlights the importance of accessible physicians, comprehensive asthma management programs, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and patient education.

The analysis also considers the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as income, housing, and access to transportation can significantly affect asthma outcomes. The 'Asthma Score' considers the availability of resources to address these social determinants, such as programs that provide assistance with housing, transportation, and food security.

In conclusion, the 'Asthma Score' analysis provides a valuable overview of asthma care in 30067. The assessment identifies areas of strength and areas for improvement, guiding patients and healthcare providers in their efforts to improve asthma management. While the analysis is based on publicly available information and general trends, the landscape of healthcare is constantly changing.

To gain a deeper understanding of the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and patient needs in 30067, consider utilizing the advanced mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Explore the visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and community resources.