30165, Rome, Georgia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30165, Rome, Georgia is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.39 percent of the residents in 30165 has some form of health insurance. 36.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30165 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,026 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30165. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,174 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,715 health care providers accessible to residents in 30165, Rome, Georgia.

The task is to assess the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 30165, focusing on primary care availability and related resources in Rome, Georgia. This analysis will synthesize available data to create an “Asthma Score,” a subjective measure reflecting the quality and accessibility of asthma-related healthcare. The score will consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This assessment is intended to provide a general overview, and specific recommendations for individual patients should always come from direct consultation with a qualified healthcare provider.

The foundation of any asthma care assessment begins with primary care accessibility. Rome, Georgia, presents a unique demographic profile, and therefore, primary care physician (PCP) availability is a critical factor. A lower PCP-to-patient ratio generally signifies better access to care. However, it is essential to consider the distribution of these physicians across the city. Are they concentrated in specific areas, or are they evenly distributed to serve the entire population, including those residing in 30165? This geographic distribution directly influences the ease with which patients can access routine checkups, asthma management consultations, and urgent care when needed.

Physician-to-patient ratios are not the sole determinant of quality. The presence of specialized asthma care within the primary care setting significantly enhances the Asthma Score. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management, such as incorporating spirometry testing and providing patient education on asthma triggers and medication adherence, are vital. Practices that proactively monitor asthma control, using standardized questionnaires or regular follow-up appointments, demonstrate a higher level of care. Furthermore, the availability of certified asthma educators within a practice contributes positively to patient outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the Asthma Score. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, which is particularly beneficial for those with chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can reduce travel time and costs, improve access to specialists, and facilitate more frequent monitoring of asthma symptoms. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of peak flow meters, and online patient portals for medication refills and communication with their providers receive higher marks. The availability of telehealth can be a game-changer, especially for patients living in more rural areas or those with mobility issues.

Mental health considerations are frequently overlooked in asthma management, but they are essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care model are highly valued. This might involve screening patients for mental health issues, providing referrals to mental health professionals, or incorporating mental health support groups into their programs. The integration of mental health resources demonstrates a holistic approach to patient care and significantly improves the Asthma Score.

Standout practices are those that excel in multiple areas of asthma care. These practices often have a dedicated asthma management program, a team of trained professionals, and a commitment to patient education and support. They may also participate in research studies or quality improvement initiatives, demonstrating a commitment to staying at the forefront of asthma care. These practices often serve as models for other providers and significantly contribute to the overall quality of care in the community. They can be identified through patient testimonials, online reviews, and referrals from other healthcare providers.

The Asthma Score, in the context of Rome, Georgia, and ZIP code 30165, is therefore a composite measure. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialized asthma care within primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the presence of standout practices. A high score indicates that patients in the area have good access to quality asthma care, while a low score suggests that there are areas for improvement. The precise value of the Asthma Score is subjective and depends on the weighting assigned to each of these factors.

Analyzing the specific practices within ZIP code 30165 requires gathering information about the services they offer. This includes identifying the number of primary care physicians, their patient load, the availability of specialized asthma care, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This information can be obtained from various sources, including insurance provider directories, online physician databases, and direct inquiries to the practices themselves. Public health data and local hospital records may also provide valuable insights.

The process of gathering and analyzing this data is complex. It requires careful research, data aggregation, and a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape. The final Asthma Score is intended to be a starting point for further investigation and should not be considered a definitive assessment of any individual practice. The goal is to provide a general overview of the asthma care environment in the specified area.

The final Asthma Score will also be influenced by the specific needs of the population. For example, the prevalence of asthma in the area, the socioeconomic status of the residents, and the availability of public transportation all play a role in the overall quality of care. These factors must be considered when interpreting the Asthma Score and making recommendations for improvement.

Ultimately, improving asthma care requires a collaborative effort. It involves healthcare providers, patients, community organizations, and policymakers. By working together, these stakeholders can create a healthcare system that provides high-quality, accessible, and patient-centered asthma care. The Asthma Score is one tool that can be used to assess the current state of care and identify areas for improvement.

To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data points, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 30165 and Rome, Georgia.