The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30218, Gay, Georgia is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.20 percent of the residents in 30218 has some form of health insurance. 32.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30218 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 286 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30218. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 339 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 223 health care providers accessible to residents in 30218, Gay, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30218, Gay, Georgia
Asthma Score | 9 |
---|---|
People Score | 30 |
Provider Score | 11 |
Hospital Score | 33 |
Travel Score | 42 |
30218 | Gay | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below examines asthma care within ZIP code 30218, encompassing the town of Gay, Georgia, focusing on primary care accessibility and related factors. The goal is to provide an “Asthma Score” assessment, though the limitations of readily available data necessitate a qualitative, rather than purely quantitative, approach. This assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, crucial elements in effective asthma management.
Gay, Georgia, is a small community, and 30218 represents a relatively rural area. This geographic context significantly impacts healthcare access. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely a key determinant of the overall “Asthma Score.” A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, suggests potential challenges in securing timely appointments for asthma-related issues, including routine check-ups, acute exacerbations, and specialist referrals. Publicly available data on physician counts within this specific ZIP code is often limited. Therefore, estimations are based on broader county-level statistics (likely Meriwether County) and inferences drawn from the size and demographic makeup of Gay.
The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is the cornerstone of asthma management. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients, providing diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing monitoring. Their accessibility, including appointment wait times and office hours, is critical. A high “Asthma Score” would ideally reflect a readily available and responsive primary care network. Conversely, limited PCP availability would significantly lower the score, potentially leading to delayed diagnosis, undertreatment, and increased hospitalizations.
Identifying standout practices within 30218 is challenging without direct, granular data. However, assessing the characteristics of existing practices is possible. Practices that prioritize patient education, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and offer after-hours care would receive higher marks. Practices with a history of actively participating in asthma-related community outreach programs would also be viewed favorably. This includes offering educational workshops, partnering with schools, and promoting awareness of asthma triggers and management strategies.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant in asthma care, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, enabling patients to consult with their physicians remotely. This is particularly valuable for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and addressing acute asthma symptoms. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities, would contribute positively to the “Asthma Score.” This includes the use of devices that can transmit peak flow readings or other relevant data to the physician.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, yet they are critical. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. Practices that integrate mental health support, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external mental health providers, would receive a higher score. This integration acknowledges the holistic nature of patient care and the interconnectedness of physical and mental well-being.
The “Asthma Score” for 30218, based on the available information, is likely moderate. The rural nature of Gay suggests potential limitations in physician availability, which could negatively impact the score. The absence of detailed data on practice characteristics and telemedicine adoption makes a precise assessment difficult. However, the presence of any practices that prioritize patient education, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and integrate mental health resources would improve the score.
The availability of primary care physicians is likely the most significant factor influencing the “Asthma Score.” If the physician-to-patient ratio is low, this would likely be the most significant impediment to achieving a higher score. The degree to which practices have adopted telemedicine would also be a key factor. The more telemedicine is embraced, the higher the score.
The overall assessment requires consideration of the broader healthcare landscape. Access to specialist care, such as pulmonologists and allergists, is also essential for complex asthma cases. Transportation challenges, particularly for patients without reliable access to vehicles, can further complicate healthcare access. These factors, while not directly assessed in the “Asthma Score,” would undoubtedly influence the overall effectiveness of asthma management in the community.
In conclusion, the “Asthma Score” for 30218, Gay, Georgia, is an estimate based on the available data. The rural setting presents both challenges and opportunities. The availability of primary care physicians, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources are key determinants of the score.
To gain a more in-depth understanding of the healthcare landscape in 30218, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and demographic data, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps provide a visual representation of healthcare resources, enabling a more informed assessment of asthma care accessibility in Gay, Georgia.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like