The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30259, Moreland, Georgia is 20 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.90 percent of the residents in 30259 has some form of health insurance. 22.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30259 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 984 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30259. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 529 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,600 health care providers accessible to residents in 30259, Moreland, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30259, Moreland, Georgia
Asthma Score | 48 |
---|---|
People Score | 70 |
Provider Score | 20 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 61 |
30259 | Moreland | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: 30259 & Moreland Primary Care
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services within ZIP code 30259 (Moreland, Georgia) with a specific focus on asthma management. We'll evaluate factors impacting asthma care, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive "Asthma Score" assessment. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the landscape for asthma sufferers in this area and identify potential areas for improvement.
Moreland, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities for healthcare delivery. Its relative isolation and limited resources necessitate a careful examination of the existing infrastructure and its capacity to meet the needs of residents, particularly those with chronic conditions like asthma. The analysis will move beyond simple metrics to assess the holistic approach to patient care.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator of accessibility. Accurate data on the precise number of primary care physicians actively practicing within 30259 is essential. Publicly available databases, such as those maintained by the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), provide this information. However, these sources may not always reflect the current availability due to physician retirements, relocations, or changes in practice status. A lower physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer physicians per resident, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to preventative care, exacerbating asthma symptoms and increasing the likelihood of emergency room visits. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a more readily accessible healthcare system.
Beyond the raw numbers, the type of primary care practices within 30259 is critical. Are there solo practitioners, multi-physician groups, or larger hospital-affiliated clinics? Group practices often offer advantages, such as shared resources, broader coverage, and the ability to provide specialized care. Clinics affiliated with hospitals may have access to advanced diagnostic tools and a more comprehensive range of services, including pulmonary specialists and respiratory therapists, who are invaluable in asthma management. This is especially important for those with severe or poorly controlled asthma. The presence of these specialists within the primary care network significantly impacts the overall Asthma Score.
The practices’ approaches to asthma management are also vital. Do they adhere to established guidelines, such as those published by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)? Do they utilize evidence-based practices, including regular spirometry testing to assess lung function, personalized asthma action plans, and patient education on medication use and environmental control measures? Practices that prioritize patient education and empowerment, equipping patients with the knowledge and tools to manage their condition effectively, are likely to achieve better outcomes and contribute to a higher Asthma Score.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant factor in healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in 30259 is crucial. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving access to care for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for asthma patients, enabling regular check-ins, medication adjustments, and symptom monitoring. Practices that embrace telemedicine are likely to score higher in the Asthma Score analysis, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.
The integration of mental health resources into primary care is increasingly recognized as essential. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, either through on-site therapists or referrals to qualified mental health professionals, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. Addressing the psychological aspects of asthma can lead to improved adherence to treatment plans and better overall asthma control. The availability of these resources is a key component of the Asthma Score.
Standout practices within 30259 deserve special attention. Identifying practices that excel in asthma management, as evidenced by patient outcomes, patient satisfaction surveys, and adherence to best practices, is crucial. These practices can serve as models for others, demonstrating effective strategies for improving asthma care. This analysis should highlight these exemplary practices, focusing on their specific approaches and the impact they have on their patients. This could include practices that actively participate in community outreach programs, provide educational materials in multiple languages, or offer extended hours to accommodate patients' needs.
The Asthma Score, therefore, is a composite measure, reflecting the interplay of all these factors. It is not a single number but a nuanced assessment of the healthcare environment for asthma sufferers in 30259. A higher score indicates a more favorable environment, with greater access to care, a focus on evidence-based practices, and a commitment to patient well-being. A lower score highlights areas for improvement, such as increasing physician availability, expanding telemedicine services, and integrating mental health resources.
The analysis would also consider the availability of asthma education programs, support groups, and community resources. The presence of these resources can empower patients to take an active role in managing their condition, leading to improved outcomes. This includes access to local pharmacies with knowledgeable pharmacists who can provide medication counseling and education.
Furthermore, it is important to consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact asthma management. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and substandard housing conditions can all exacerbate asthma symptoms. The analysis should consider these factors and assess the availability of social services and community support programs that can address these challenges. This could include programs that provide assistance with medication costs, housing improvements, and access to nutritious food.
Ultimately, the goal of this Asthma Score analysis is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the asthma care landscape in 30259 and Moreland. This information can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members to identify areas for improvement and develop strategies to enhance the quality of life for asthma sufferers. The analysis is a dynamic process, requiring ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that the healthcare system is meeting the evolving needs of the community.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in 30259 and explore the distribution of primary care resources, including physician locations and practice characteristics, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a powerful tool for analyzing geographic data and gaining a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like