The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30332, Atlanta, Georgia is 69 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.79 percent of the residents in 30332 has some form of health insurance. 1.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 96.09 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30332 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 543 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 82 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30332. An estimate of 52 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 40,819 health care providers accessible to residents in 30332, Atlanta, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30332, Atlanta, Georgia
Asthma Score | 81 |
---|---|
People Score | 73 |
Provider Score | 69 |
Hospital Score | 34 |
Travel Score | 65 |
30332 | Atlanta | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 30332 and Primary Care Availability in Atlanta**
The analysis focuses on the intersection of asthma care quality and accessibility within ZIP Code 30332, a specific area in Atlanta, and its relationship to the broader primary care landscape in the city. The assessment considers factors impacting asthma management, including physician availability, healthcare resource utilization, and innovative care models. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment for asthma patients in this region, allowing for informed decision-making by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of healthcare accessibility. In ZIP Code 30332, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts the ability of asthma patients to receive timely diagnoses, treatment, and ongoing management. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventive care, and potential delays in addressing asthma exacerbations. The analysis would ideally incorporate data from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau to calculate the ratio and compare it to the average for Atlanta and national benchmarks. Areas with higher ratios might indicate a need for increased recruitment and retention of PCPs or the development of alternative care models.
Within the 30332 ZIP code, the quality of asthma care is significantly influenced by the characteristics of primary care practices. Standout practices are those that demonstrate excellence in asthma management. These practices typically have a robust system for asthma education, offering patients comprehensive information about their condition, triggers, and medication management. They may employ certified asthma educators, conduct regular asthma action plan reviews, and actively monitor patient adherence to treatment regimens. Practices that integrate electronic health records (EHRs) effectively often demonstrate improved care coordination and the ability to track patient outcomes. Additionally, practices with a strong focus on preventive care, such as regular check-ups and vaccinations, can help reduce the frequency and severity of asthma exacerbations. The analysis would identify practices that have been recognized for quality care through patient surveys, awards, or accreditations.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve access to asthma care, particularly for patients in underserved areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for in-person visits and travel time. This can be particularly beneficial for asthma patients who may experience difficulty breathing or have other health conditions that make travel challenging. The analysis would assess the extent to which primary care practices in 30332 utilize telemedicine for asthma management. This includes examining the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring tools (e.g., peak flow meters with data transmission), and the integration of telemedicine into patient education and support programs. The analysis would also consider the barriers to telemedicine adoption, such as lack of internet access, digital literacy challenges, and reimbursement policies.
The complex nature of asthma often involves mental health considerations. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Addressing the mental health needs of asthma patients is crucial for comprehensive care. The analysis would examine the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices in 30332. This includes assessing whether practices have integrated behavioral health specialists, offer mental health screenings, or have established referral pathways to mental health providers. The analysis would also consider the availability of support groups and educational programs that address the psychological aspects of asthma. A practice that effectively integrates mental health services into its asthma management program demonstrates a commitment to holistic patient care.
Beyond the immediate care, the broader context of primary care availability in Atlanta is relevant. The overall density of PCPs, the distribution of specialists (e.g., pulmonologists, allergists), and the accessibility of urgent care facilities all contribute to the overall quality of asthma care. The analysis would consider the geographic distribution of healthcare resources across Atlanta, identifying areas with potential shortages or disparities in access. It would also assess the availability of transportation options for patients, as transportation barriers can significantly impact access to care. Public transportation, ride-sharing services, and the availability of parking near healthcare facilities are all relevant factors.
The analysis would also consider the impact of social determinants of health on asthma outcomes. Factors such as housing quality, exposure to environmental pollutants, and socioeconomic status can significantly influence asthma prevalence and severity. The analysis would examine the prevalence of these factors in 30332 and assess how healthcare providers are addressing them. This might include collaborations with community organizations, participation in outreach programs, and the provision of resources to help patients improve their living conditions.
Finally, the analysis would consider the role of insurance coverage in access to asthma care. The type of insurance coverage, whether private, public, or uninsured, can impact a patient's ability to access care and afford medications. The analysis would examine the insurance landscape in 30332 and assess the availability of resources to help patients navigate the healthcare system and access financial assistance programs. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer patient assistance programs demonstrate a commitment to ensuring that all patients have access to the care they need.
The analysis would synthesize all of these factors into an asthma score for the 30332 ZIP code, providing a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare environment for asthma patients in this area. This score could be used to identify areas for improvement, guide resource allocation, and inform policy decisions. The goal is to empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to work together to improve the quality of asthma care and ensure that all patients have the opportunity to live healthy lives.
**Explore the data visually with CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Atlanta. Visit CartoChrome today!**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like