The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30454, Rockledge, Georgia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.90 percent of the residents in 30454 has some form of health insurance. 75.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 25.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30454 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 153 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30454. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 151 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 68 health care providers accessible to residents in 30454, Rockledge, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30454, Rockledge, Georgia
Asthma Score | 85 |
---|---|
People Score | 71 |
Provider Score | 75 |
Hospital Score | 81 |
Travel Score | 21 |
30454 | Rockledge | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care in Rockledge, ZIP code 30454, requires a multi-faceted approach, evaluating not just the number of physicians but also the quality of care, accessibility, and integration of modern healthcare practices. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape, incorporating factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine utilization, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of effective asthma management.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Rockledge is a critical starting point. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per primary care physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times, less individualized attention, and challenges in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards can provide estimates of physician density within the 30454 ZIP code. This data should be supplemented by information on the specialization of these physicians. Are there sufficient numbers of pulmonologists and allergists, specialists crucial for asthma diagnosis and treatment, within the area? A shortage of these specialists would significantly impact the asthma score, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and inadequate management plans.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Evaluating the practices themselves is essential. This involves examining factors like patient satisfaction scores, which can often be found through online review platforms and surveys. These reviews offer insights into patient experiences, including wait times, the clarity of communication, and the overall feeling of care received. Furthermore, it’s vital to assess the adherence of practices to established asthma guidelines, such as those published by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Practices that consistently follow these guidelines are more likely to provide evidence-based care and achieve better patient outcomes. This can be assessed through audits of patient records (with appropriate patient consent and data privacy safeguards), or by examining the practice’s participation in quality improvement programs.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in the asthma score. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of symptoms, and medication refills via telehealth platforms can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially reduce the burden on the healthcare system, improve patient adherence to treatment plans, and proactively manage asthma exacerbations. The presence of a robust telemedicine infrastructure, including secure video conferencing, remote monitoring devices (like peak flow meters that can transmit data), and patient portals, would positively influence the asthma score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are critically important. Asthma can be a stressful condition, and anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms. The availability of mental health services, either within primary care practices or through referrals to external providers, is therefore an essential component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that integrate mental health screening and counseling into their asthma management plans demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care, and this would contribute positively to the asthma score. This could include partnerships with mental health professionals, providing educational materials on stress management, and offering support groups for patients.
Standout practices in Rockledge deserve specific recognition. Identifying practices that excel in asthma care requires a deeper dive into their operations. This includes assessing their use of electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, monitor medication adherence, and coordinate care with other specialists. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively are better equipped to provide proactive and personalized care. Another factor is the practice’s commitment to patient education. Do they provide educational materials on asthma triggers, medication use, and self-management techniques? Practices that empower patients with knowledge are more likely to see improved outcomes. The presence of certified asthma educators within the practice would be a significant positive indicator.
The overall asthma score for doctors in ZIP code 30454 would be a composite score, reflecting the various factors discussed above. A practice with a high score would likely have a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, a strong commitment to evidence-based care, a robust telemedicine infrastructure, integrated mental health resources, and a focus on patient education. Conversely, a practice with a lower score might face challenges in these areas, potentially leading to poorer patient outcomes. The specific weighting of each factor in the composite score would depend on their relative importance in achieving optimal asthma management.
Analyzing the primary care availability in Rockledge is also vital. The accessibility of primary care physicians is a fundamental determinant of asthma care. If patients struggle to access primary care, they are less likely to receive timely diagnoses, appropriate treatment, and ongoing management of their asthma. This analysis should consider the geographic distribution of primary care practices, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of evening and weekend appointments. Practices that are easily accessible, both geographically and financially, would contribute positively to the overall asthma score.
In conclusion, assessing asthma care in Rockledge, ZIP code 30454, requires a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the accessibility of primary care all play crucial roles in determining the effectiveness of asthma management. By evaluating these factors, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and identify areas for improvement.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and patient demographics, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome's interactive mapping platform allows for a spatial analysis of healthcare data, providing valuable insights into access to care and areas where resources are most needed.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like