30572, Suches, Georgia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30572, Suches, Georgia is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.61 percent of the residents in 30572 has some form of health insurance. 40.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30572 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 144 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30572. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 357 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 700 health care providers accessible to residents in 30572, Suches, Georgia.

Analyzing asthma care and primary care access within a specific geographic area requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will focus on doctors in ZIP Code 30572 and primary care availability in Suches, Georgia, aiming to provide an 'Asthma Score' assessment. Due to the limitations of publicly available data and the dynamic nature of healthcare, this will be a hypothetical evaluation based on general principles and available information.

The first step is to establish a baseline understanding of the area. ZIP Code 30572 likely encompasses a larger population than the small community of Suches. Suches, nestled in the North Georgia mountains, is known for its rural character. This geographical context is crucial. Rural areas often face challenges in healthcare access, including fewer physicians, longer travel times, and potential limitations in specialized care.

The Asthma Score itself is a composite measure. It considers several factors, each contributing to the overall assessment of asthma care quality and accessibility. Key components include the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists (pulmonologists, allergists) per capita, the availability of asthma-specific resources, and the adoption of innovative healthcare delivery models.

Physician-to-patient ratios are fundamental. A higher ratio of physicians to the population generally indicates better access to care. Determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio in 30572 and Suches would require data from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board or the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with physician directories. However, the rural nature of Suches suggests a potentially lower ratio compared to the broader 30572 area. This disparity would negatively impact the Asthma Score for Suches.

The availability of specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, is also critical. Asthma is a chronic condition often requiring specialized management. If residents of Suches need to travel significant distances to see a specialist, their Asthma Score would be affected. The analysis would need to identify the nearest specialists and the travel time involved.

Standout practices, if any, would significantly improve the Asthma Score. These could include practices with a demonstrated commitment to asthma management, such as those utilizing asthma action plans, providing patient education, and participating in quality improvement initiatives. Identifying these practices would involve reviewing physician profiles, checking for accreditations or certifications related to asthma care, and potentially contacting local healthcare organizations for recommendations.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial element in improving healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving convenience. Practices in 30572 and Suches that offer telemedicine services for asthma management would receive a higher score. This could include virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online patient education programs.

Mental health resources are an increasingly important consideration in asthma management. Asthma can have a significant impact on mental well-being, and patients with asthma may experience anxiety, depression, or other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care, either through in-house providers or referrals to mental health professionals, would receive a higher score.

Assessing the availability of asthma-specific resources is another key factor. This includes access to asthma education programs, support groups, and resources for managing asthma triggers. The analysis would investigate the presence of these resources within the 30572 area and Suches, considering their accessibility and the extent to which they are integrated into primary care practices.

The analysis must also consider the presence of urgent care facilities and emergency rooms in the area. Asthma exacerbations can require immediate medical attention. The proximity and accessibility of these facilities are crucial for managing acute asthma episodes. The analysis would evaluate the availability of these services and their capacity to handle asthma-related emergencies.

The hypothetical 'Asthma Score' for doctors in 30572 and primary care availability in Suches would be a comparative assessment. 30572, being a larger area, might have a higher overall score due to potentially better physician-to-patient ratios and greater access to specialized care. However, within 30572, disparities could exist based on location and socioeconomic factors. Suches, with its rural character, would likely face challenges in accessing care, potentially resulting in a lower score. The score could be improved by telemedicine adoption, and practices that prioritize asthma management.

The analysis would also consider the quality of care. This would involve assessing the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, the implementation of asthma action plans, and the patient satisfaction levels. Data on these factors would be difficult to obtain without direct access to patient records or practice-specific information.

The final 'Asthma Score' would be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed. The score would be presented as a numerical value or a qualitative rating (e.g., excellent, good, fair, poor). The analysis would also provide recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and improving access to asthma-specific resources.

This analysis emphasizes the importance of data-driven decision-making in healthcare. Accurate and up-to-date information is essential for assessing healthcare access and quality. The 'Asthma Score' is a tool that can be used to identify areas for improvement and to inform healthcare policy decisions.

If you're interested in visualizing healthcare data, including physician locations, patient demographics, and resource availability, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive way to understand the healthcare landscape in 30572 and Suches.