The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30730, Lyerly, Georgia is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.16 percent of the residents in 30730 has some form of health insurance. 47.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.65 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30730 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 354 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30730. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 363 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,103 health care providers accessible to residents in 30730, Lyerly, Georgia.
Health Scores in 30730, Lyerly, Georgia
Asthma Score | 70 |
---|---|
People Score | 49 |
Provider Score | 75 |
Hospital Score | 66 |
Travel Score | 31 |
30730 | Lyerly | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the quality of asthma care and primary care availability within ZIP Code 30730, which encompasses Lyerly, Georgia, with a focus on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. An "Asthma Score" is constructed, though it's important to note that this is a hypothetical construct for the purpose of this analysis and doesn't represent a standardized, universally recognized metric. It’s an interpretive assessment based on available data and assumptions.
The foundation of any healthcare assessment in a rural area like Lyerly begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric is critical. A low ratio, meaning a small number of physicians serving a large population, can significantly hinder access to care. While precise, real-time physician counts are often proprietary, publicly available data sources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide estimates. Data from these sources, coupled with local knowledge and information from the Georgia Composite Medical Board, would be essential to estimate the number of primary care physicians and specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, serving the 30730 ZIP code. Comparing this estimated physician count to the population of Lyerly provides the base for the first component of our Asthma Score. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, contributes positively to the score.
Primary care availability directly impacts asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication refills, and prompt attention to exacerbations are all crucial. The physical location of primary care practices within Lyerly is also a factor. Is there a central clinic, or are services spread across a wider geographic area? The accessibility of these locations, considering factors like transportation options for patients, also plays a role. Practices that offer extended hours or weekend appointments further enhance accessibility. The Asthma Score considers these factors, giving higher marks to areas with readily accessible primary care.
Identifying "standout practices" requires evaluating the quality of care offered. This involves assessing the practice's adherence to established asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Does the practice utilize spirometry to assess lung function? Do they provide patient education on proper inhaler technique and asthma triggers? Are they proactive in developing asthma action plans for their patients? Practices that demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based care and patient education would receive higher marks in the Asthma Score. Patient reviews and testimonials, where available, would also be considered to gauge patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can overcome geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely, monitor their symptoms, and receive medication management. Practices that offer telehealth services, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, would receive a boost in the Asthma Score. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data electronically, would further enhance the score. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform, including its integration with patient portals and electronic health records, is also relevant.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical aspect of asthma care. Asthma can be a chronic condition that significantly impacts a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health screening and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, would receive higher marks in the Asthma Score. This could include access to psychologists, therapists, or psychiatrists specializing in chronic illness management. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is crucial for comprehensive patient care.
Constructing the Asthma Score, therefore, involves weighing these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio forms the foundation, reflecting the availability of care. Primary care accessibility, including location, hours, and transportation considerations, is then factored in. Standout practices, judged by adherence to guidelines, patient education, and patient satisfaction, receive additional points. Telemedicine adoption, providing remote access and monitoring, is another significant component. Finally, the integration of mental health resources adds a crucial dimension to the score. The Asthma Score, in this hypothetical scenario, is a composite metric reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Lyerly.
For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, easily accessible primary care, a strong emphasis on patient education, and robust telemedicine capabilities, along with access to mental health resources, would receive a high score. Conversely, a practice with limited physician availability, poor accessibility, and a lack of patient education and telemedicine options would receive a lower score.
In Lyerly, the specifics are critical. Is there a single, dominant primary care provider, or are there several smaller practices? What are the wait times for appointments? What is the level of insurance acceptance? Are there any specialists, such as pulmonologists or allergists, who regularly see patients in the area, or do patients need to travel to larger cities for specialized care? These details would influence the final Asthma Score assessment.
The Asthma Score for 30730 would be determined by combining all of the above factors. The final score is an interpretation, a snapshot of the healthcare landscape at a given time. It's a dynamic assessment that should be updated regularly to reflect changes in physician availability, practice practices, and the adoption of new technologies.
To gain a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare landscape in Lyerly, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care, providing a comprehensive overview of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like