The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31213, Macon, Georgia is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 31213 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31213 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31213. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,000 health care providers accessible to residents in 31213, Macon, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31213, Macon, Georgia
Asthma Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 78 |
Hospital Score | 64 |
Travel Score | 57 |
31213 | Macon | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 31213 and Primary Care Availability in Macon**
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 31213, encompassing a significant portion of Macon, Georgia, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, specifically focusing on their capacity to address asthma management, and explore related factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide an Asthma Score assessment, offering insights into the accessibility and quality of asthma care in this specific geographic area.
Assessing primary care availability begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can translate into longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to care, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. While precise, up-to-the-minute physician counts are dynamic, publicly available data from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board and the US Census Bureau can be used to derive estimates. The ratio is then compared to national averages and benchmarks for urban and rural areas, providing a relative measure of access. A concerningly high patient-to-physician ratio would significantly impact the Asthma Score negatively.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality and capacity of individual practices are crucial. Identifying standout practices within 31213 involves looking for those that have demonstrated a commitment to asthma management. This includes practices that employ certified asthma educators, offer comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitor patient outcomes. Reviews from patients, accreditation from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and participation in value-based care programs are all indicators of a practice's dedication to quality. The presence of specialized equipment, such as spirometry machines for lung function testing, further enhances a practice’s ability to provide effective asthma care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially provide more frequent monitoring of asthma symptoms, leading to better control and fewer exacerbations. The Asthma Score will benefit from a high adoption rate of telemedicine within the primary care landscape.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as essential for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Asthma can be significantly impacted by stress, anxiety, and depression. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. Such integration can help patients manage their emotional well-being, which in turn can improve their asthma control and overall quality of life. The presence of these resources would positively influence the Asthma Score.
The Asthma Score itself is a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed above. It is not a single, definitive number but rather a qualitative assessment. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score might be presented on a scale (e.g., poor, fair, good, excellent) or as a narrative summary. The assessment is dynamic and should be updated periodically to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
For ZIP code 31213, the Asthma Score would be based on the specific characteristics of the local healthcare system. If the physician-to-patient ratio is favorable, if many practices have adopted telemedicine, and if many practices have strong asthma management programs and mental health integration, the score would be higher. Conversely, a high patient-to-physician ratio, a lack of telemedicine, and limited mental health resources would result in a lower score.
Primary care availability in Macon as a whole is also a factor. The overall health of the primary care system impacts the ability of those in 31213 to access care. If Macon is experiencing a shortage of primary care physicians, it will negatively impact the Asthma Score. However, if Macon has a robust primary care system, then the Asthma Score will benefit.
The analysis would then identify specific practices within 31213 that are performing well in terms of asthma management. This might include highlighting practices with certified asthma educators, those that have embraced telemedicine, and those with strong patient satisfaction scores. The analysis might also identify areas for improvement, such as the need for more mental health integration or the potential for increased telemedicine adoption.
The final Asthma Score assessment would provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It would help patients make informed decisions about their care, guide healthcare providers in improving their asthma management programs, and inform policymakers about the need for healthcare improvements in the area.
The analysis is a snapshot in time. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. Physician availability, practice models, and the integration of new technologies are all subject to change. Regular updates and revisions are essential to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the Asthma Score assessment.
This analysis underscores the complexities of assessing healthcare access and quality. It demonstrates the need for a holistic approach that considers not only the number of physicians but also the quality of care, the adoption of technology, and the integration of mental health resources.
The data and insights discussed in this analysis can be visualized and explored further using interactive mapping tools. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Macon, and specifically within ZIP code 31213, and to identify potential gaps in care, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like