The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31216, Macon, Georgia is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.12 percent of the residents in 31216 has some form of health insurance. 30.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.62 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31216 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,093 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31216. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,795 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,042 health care providers accessible to residents in 31216, Macon, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31216, Macon, Georgia
Asthma Score | 52 |
---|---|
People Score | 49 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 15 |
Travel Score | 57 |
31216 | Macon | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Macon, GA (ZIP Code 31216) and Primary Care Landscape
This analysis delves into the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 31216 in Macon, Georgia, assessing the availability and quality of primary care services, with a focus on asthma management. We will explore physician-to-patient ratios, highlight potentially standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and consider the integration of mental health resources, ultimately providing a comprehensive “Asthma Score” analysis.
The prevalence of asthma in Macon, and specifically within ZIP code 31216, is a crucial starting point. While specific, up-to-the-minute prevalence data requires access to real-time health records (which is beyond the scope of this analysis), we can assume, based on national averages and demographic factors, that asthma is a significant health concern. The impact of asthma on individuals and the community necessitates a robust primary care system capable of providing timely diagnosis, effective treatment, and ongoing management.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access to care. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially, poorer asthma control. Publicly available data from sources like the Georgia Composite Medical Board, combined with census information, can provide an estimate of the physician-to-patient ratio in 31216. This ratio needs to be compared to both the national average and the average for similar-sized cities to gauge the relative availability of primary care physicians. A shortage of physicians necessitates creative solutions, such as the strategic deployment of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who can provide a significant portion of primary care services.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. Practices that prioritize asthma management often demonstrate specific characteristics. These include: the availability of certified asthma educators, who provide patient education on triggers, medication management, and proper inhaler technique; the implementation of asthma action plans, tailored to individual patient needs; and the use of electronic health records to track patient progress and ensure consistent care. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, aimed at improving asthma outcomes, are likely to be delivering superior care. Reviews from patients, available through online platforms, can also offer insights into the quality of care provided by specific practices.
Telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve asthma management, particularly for patients in underserved areas or those with mobility limitations. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of symptoms. Its adoption, however, varies among practices. Practices that have embraced telemedicine often demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care. The availability of telehealth services, the types of services offered (e.g., virtual check-ups, medication management), and the ease of access (e.g., scheduling, technical support) all contribute to the effectiveness of telemedicine in asthma care.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into primary care is crucial. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of asthma patients. This can involve screening for mental health conditions, providing brief interventions, and facilitating access to specialized mental health care when needed. The availability of mental health support services directly impacts the overall “Asthma Score” of the primary care landscape.
Assessing the overall “Asthma Score” requires synthesizing the information gathered. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of certified asthma educators, the implementation of asthma action plans, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources all contribute to the final score. The score is a composite measure reflecting the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of asthma care within the specified geographic area. A high score indicates a robust and well-integrated primary care system, while a low score suggests areas for improvement.
The primary care landscape in Macon, and specifically within ZIP code 31216, is dynamic and subject to change. New practices may emerge, existing practices may adopt new technologies, and the availability of resources may fluctuate. Therefore, ongoing monitoring and evaluation are essential. The “Asthma Score” is not a static measure but a snapshot in time, reflecting the current state of the healthcare system.
To truly understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and the impact on asthma care, geographic analysis is essential. Mapping the location of primary care practices, the demographics of the patient population, and the prevalence of asthma can reveal patterns and disparities. This geographic analysis can help identify areas with limited access to care and inform strategies for improving asthma management.
For a deeper dive into the geographic aspects of healthcare in Macon and to visualize the factors influencing asthma outcomes, explore the power of spatial analysis with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, enabling a more nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape and facilitating data-driven decision-making.
By combining comprehensive data analysis with geographic visualization, we can gain a more complete understanding of the asthma care landscape in Macon, Georgia, and work towards improving the health and well-being of the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like