The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31321, Pembroke, Georgia is 13 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.14 percent of the residents in 31321 has some form of health insurance. 39.83 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31321 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,150 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31321. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,330 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 259 health care providers accessible to residents in 31321, Pembroke, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31321, Pembroke, Georgia
Asthma Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 24 |
Provider Score | 13 |
Hospital Score | 23 |
Travel Score | 36 |
31321 | Pembroke | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Pembroke, GA (ZIP Code 31321)
Analyzing asthma care within Pembroke, Georgia (ZIP code 31321) requires a multifaceted approach, considering not only the availability of primary care physicians but also the specific resources and practices geared towards managing asthma. This analysis will attempt to provide an ‘Asthma Score’ assessment, evaluating the landscape of care, including physician-to-patient ratios, innovative practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial for effective asthma management.
The foundation of any asthma care system is the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Pembroke, a relatively small community, presents a potential challenge in this regard. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A low ratio, meaning a limited number of doctors for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Publicly available data, such as that from the Georgia Composite Medical Board, can provide insights into the number of licensed PCPs practicing within the ZIP code. However, this data alone doesn't paint the complete picture. We must also consider the age and health status of the population. A community with a higher proportion of children or elderly individuals, both demographics more susceptible to asthma, would require a more robust primary care infrastructure.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. We need to assess the practices' adherence to national asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). This involves evaluating the use of standardized asthma action plans, regular spirometry testing to assess lung function, and patient education on medication use and environmental triggers. Practices that proactively engage in these activities would score higher on our Asthma Score.
Identifying standout practices within Pembroke requires a deeper dive. This includes reviewing patient testimonials, if available, and investigating the adoption of innovative approaches. Are there any practices that have implemented asthma-specific programs, such as dedicated asthma clinics or nurse-led asthma management initiatives? These programs often provide more focused care and education, leading to better patient outcomes. Furthermore, we should investigate the practices' affiliations with hospitals or specialists. Strong referral networks to pulmonologists and allergists are essential for patients with complex or uncontrolled asthma.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor in the Asthma Score. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online patient education materials would score higher. Telemedicine can facilitate more frequent check-ins with physicians, allowing for timely adjustments to treatment plans and proactive management of asthma exacerbations.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Asthma can contribute to anxiety and depression, and conversely, these mental health conditions can worsen asthma symptoms. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into asthma care is vital. Practices that screen patients for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals would receive a higher score. This integrated approach can lead to improved patient well-being and better asthma control.
Analyzing the availability of these resources requires a combination of data collection methods. This includes reviewing practice websites, contacting practices directly to inquire about their services, and potentially surveying patients to gather their experiences. Public health data, such as information on asthma prevalence rates in the community and the availability of public health programs, can also provide valuable context.
The Asthma Score, therefore, is not a single number but a composite assessment based on various factors. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care, the adoption of innovative practices, the utilization of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. A higher score indicates a more robust and patient-centered asthma care system.
The challenges in Pembroke, like in many rural communities, likely involve limited resources and potential geographic barriers to accessing care. Identifying and addressing these challenges requires a collaborative effort involving healthcare providers, public health officials, and community organizations. Strategies might include promoting telemedicine adoption, establishing asthma-specific programs, and strengthening referral networks.
By systematically evaluating these factors, we can create a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the asthma care landscape in Pembroke, Georgia. This understanding is crucial for identifying areas of strength and weakness, and for developing strategies to improve the quality of care for individuals living with asthma. The goal is to ensure that all patients in Pembroke have access to the resources they need to effectively manage their condition and live healthier lives.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like