The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31547, Kings Bay, Georgia is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 31547 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31547 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31547. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 616 health care providers accessible to residents in 31547, Kings Bay, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31547, Kings Bay, Georgia
Asthma Score | 24 |
---|---|
People Score | 32 |
Provider Score | 23 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 41 |
31547 | Kings Bay | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in 31547 and Primary Care in Kings Bay
Analyzing healthcare access, particularly concerning asthma management within ZIP code 31547 (which encompasses Kings Bay, Georgia) requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to assess the availability and quality of primary care, considering the crucial role these physicians play in initial asthma diagnosis, ongoing management, and referral to specialists. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, evaluate telemedicine adoption, and examine the presence of mental health resources – all factors influencing an “Asthma Score” reflecting the ease and effectiveness of asthma care within the community.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially delayed asthma diagnosis or treatment adjustments. Kings Bay, being a military community, presents a unique demographic. The population's health needs are often complex, and the presence of active-duty personnel and their families necessitates a robust healthcare infrastructure. Determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio requires accessing up-to-date data from sources like the Georgia Department of Public Health and the American Medical Association. However, the presence of the Naval Branch Health Clinic Kings Bay suggests a dedicated primary care resource for military families, potentially mitigating some of the challenges posed by a potentially lower ratio within the broader civilian population.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several criteria. Practices that prioritize asthma management often incorporate features like: dedicated asthma educators, readily available peak flow meters and inhaler training, and robust patient education materials. These practices often participate in quality improvement initiatives focused on asthma care, demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based practices. Furthermore, they might offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate patients' needs. While specific practice names require data access, the presence of board-certified allergists and pulmonologists within the broader Camden County area would significantly enhance the asthma score. These specialists provide advanced diagnostic and treatment options for complex cases.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce the need for in-person visits, and facilitate remote monitoring of patients' conditions. Practices that offer virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote symptom tracking contribute positively to the asthma score. This is particularly relevant in a geographically dispersed area like Kings Bay, where travel time to healthcare facilities can be a barrier. The ability to connect with a physician remotely, especially during asthma exacerbations, can significantly improve patient outcomes.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical factor. Asthma and mental health are often interconnected. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms, and managing chronic illness can contribute to mental health challenges. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals contribute significantly to a higher asthma score. This holistic approach recognizes the complex interplay between physical and mental well-being, leading to more comprehensive and effective asthma care. A practice that integrates mental health services demonstrates a commitment to the overall well-being of its patients.
Assessing the availability of these resources requires a detailed investigation. This includes reviewing practice websites, contacting local healthcare providers, and consulting with patient advocacy groups. Data on physician specialties, telemedicine capabilities, and mental health integration can be gathered through surveys, interviews, and public health reports. This information then forms the basis for calculating an asthma score. The score would ideally incorporate weighted factors reflecting the importance of each element. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might carry a significant weight, as it directly impacts access. The presence of specialists and telemedicine capabilities could also be weighted heavily.
The asthma score, therefore, is a composite measure reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in the specified area. A higher score indicates a more favorable environment for asthma management, while a lower score suggests areas for improvement. The score would need to be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare infrastructure, technology adoption, and patient needs. The score is not simply a number, but a reflection of the community's capacity to support individuals living with asthma.
Ultimately, improving the asthma score in 31547 requires a collaborative effort. This involves healthcare providers, public health officials, community organizations, and patients themselves. Addressing any identified gaps in care, such as physician shortages or limited telemedicine access, is crucial. Promoting patient education, encouraging self-management strategies, and ensuring access to mental health resources are also vital components of a comprehensive approach. The goal is to create a healthcare environment that empowers individuals with asthma to live healthy and fulfilling lives.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, specialist availability, and the accessibility of mental health services, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping solutions that can visually represent the data gathered during this asthma score analysis. This allows for a clear understanding of healthcare access within the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like