The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31563, Surrency, Georgia is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.60 percent of the residents in 31563 has some form of health insurance. 34.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.61 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31563 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 316 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31563. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 348 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 594 health care providers accessible to residents in 31563, Surrency, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31563, Surrency, Georgia
Asthma Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 23 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 47 |
31563 | Surrency | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Surrency, GA (ZIP Code 31563)
Analyzing the availability of quality asthma care in Surrency, Georgia (ZIP Code 31563) requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider not only the presence of physicians but also the quality of their care, the accessibility of that care, and the integration of supportive resources. This analysis will delve into the physician landscape, focusing on primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health services, ultimately providing an "Asthma Score" assessment.
Surrency, a small community, presents unique challenges in healthcare access. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can significantly hinder access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma, which require regular monitoring and management. Publicly available data, such as that provided by the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), should be consulted to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP Code 31563 and the surrounding county. This ratio will serve as a foundational element in our Asthma Score calculation. A higher ratio will automatically lower the score.
Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for asthma patients. Their ability to diagnose, manage, and refer patients to specialists is crucial. The presence of a robust network of PCPs in Surrency is therefore essential. We must assess the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the surrounding area, their acceptance of new patients, and their capacity to provide comprehensive asthma care. This includes their familiarity with asthma guidelines, their use of spirometry for lung function testing, and their ability to develop personalized asthma action plans. The number of PCPs, their experience with asthma, and their accessibility contribute to the Asthma Score.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care provided by these PCPs is paramount. We need to evaluate the practices themselves. Are there any standout practices in the area? Are they known for their expertise in asthma management? Researching patient reviews, if available, and consulting with local healthcare organizations can help identify practices that consistently deliver high-quality care. Factors such as the availability of after-hours care, the ease of scheduling appointments, and the responsiveness of staff also play a significant role. A practice with a strong reputation for patient-centered care and a proactive approach to asthma management will positively impact the Asthma Score.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for expanding healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. The adoption of telemedicine by PCPs in Surrency is a crucial factor. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, facilitating medication refills, follow-up appointments, and education about asthma management. The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve the Asthma Score by reducing travel time and increasing the frequency of patient interactions. We must assess the extent to which local PCPs utilize telemedicine platforms, the types of services they offer remotely, and the ease with which patients can access these services.
Asthma often co-exists with mental health conditions like anxiety and depression. These conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder effective management. The integration of mental health resources within the primary care setting is therefore essential. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, and the availability of mental health screening tools. The presence of these resources, or the ability to easily refer patients to them, is a critical factor in improving the Asthma Score. We need to determine whether local practices offer these resources or have established referral pathways for mental health support.
The Asthma Score calculation will incorporate all these factors. Each element – physician-to-patient ratio, primary care availability, quality of care within practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource integration – will be assigned a weighted value based on its importance. The final score will be a composite value, providing a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Surrency. A high score indicates a strong healthcare environment for asthma patients, while a low score highlights areas needing improvement.
To further enhance the analysis, we must consider the broader context of healthcare access in Surrency. This includes the availability of pharmacies, respiratory therapists, and asthma educators. Access to these resources can significantly improve patient outcomes and contribute to a higher Asthma Score. Furthermore, the presence of community health initiatives and educational programs related to asthma management should be taken into account.
The analysis should also consider the demographics of the population in Surrency. Are there specific populations, such as children or the elderly, who may be disproportionately affected by asthma? Understanding the unique needs of these populations is essential for providing targeted interventions and improving the Asthma Score.
In conclusion, evaluating asthma care in Surrency, GA (31563) demands a thorough examination of the local healthcare landscape. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, we can arrive at a comprehensive Asthma Score. This score serves as a valuable tool for identifying strengths and weaknesses in the healthcare system and for guiding efforts to improve asthma care for the residents of Surrency.
To visualize this data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Surrency and surrounding areas, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful platform for visualizing geographical data, allowing you to easily analyze physician locations, healthcare resource availability, and other relevant factors.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like