The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 31716, Baconton, Georgia is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 82.95 percent of the residents in 31716 has some form of health insurance. 42.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31716 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 618 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31716. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 653 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,543 health care providers accessible to residents in 31716, Baconton, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31716, Baconton, Georgia
Asthma Score | 23 |
---|---|
People Score | 15 |
Provider Score | 59 |
Hospital Score | 37 |
Travel Score | 41 |
31716 | Baconton | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts communities, especially those with limited access to quality healthcare. This analysis delves into the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 31716 (Baconton, Georgia), evaluating the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and associated resources. The goal is to provide an “Asthma Score” assessment, considering various factors that contribute to effective asthma management.
Baconton, a small town in Mitchell County, Georgia, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The success of asthma management hinges on several key elements, including the availability of PCPs, their expertise in asthma treatment, the adoption of telehealth, and the integration of mental health services. Analyzing these factors provides a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare infrastructure supporting asthma patients.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of accessibility. A low ratio suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, increasing the risk of uncontrolled asthma. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and the Georgia Department of Public Health is crucial for determining the PCP-to-population ratio in Baconton. If the ratio is low, this negatively impacts the Asthma Score. Strategies to improve accessibility, such as recruiting more physicians or expanding clinic hours, are essential.
Beyond mere numbers, the expertise of PCPs in asthma management is paramount. This involves assessing their knowledge of current asthma guidelines, their ability to diagnose and treat asthma effectively, and their willingness to collaborate with specialists, such as pulmonologists. Reviewing patient testimonials, physician profiles, and clinic websites can reveal information about a physician's specialization in asthma care. Physicians with certifications or specialized training in asthma management would positively influence the Asthma Score.
Telemedicine offers a significant advantage in rural areas like Baconton, where geographical barriers can limit access to care. Telehealth consultations can provide convenient access to follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education. The Asthma Score reflects the extent of telemedicine adoption by local practices. Practices actively using telehealth for asthma management would receive a higher score. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters with data transmission capabilities, further enhances the effectiveness of telemedicine.
The often-overlooked aspect of asthma management is the integration of mental health resources. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. PCPs who screen for mental health issues and have established referral pathways to mental health professionals are critical. The Asthma Score considers the availability of mental health services and the integration of mental health care into asthma management plans. Practices that offer on-site mental health support or have strong referral networks would receive a higher score.
Identifying standout practices in Baconton requires a deeper dive into their operational practices. This includes evaluating their patient education programs, the use of asthma action plans, and their adherence to national guidelines. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, provide comprehensive education, and regularly review treatment plans would be considered standout practices. The Asthma Score reflects the quality of care provided by these practices.
To determine the Asthma Score, a weighted scoring system is applied. The weighting is based on the relative importance of each factor. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio and the expertise of the PCPs might carry a higher weight than telemedicine adoption. The final score is a composite number, reflecting the overall quality of asthma care in Baconton. A higher score indicates a better healthcare environment for asthma patients.
The analysis considers specific practices within the 31716 ZIP code. The evaluation involves researching each practice's website, reviewing online patient reviews, and contacting the practices directly to gather information about their services. The goal is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each practice and to assess their contribution to the overall Asthma Score.
Data sources used for this analysis include the U.S. Census Bureau, the Georgia Department of Public Health, the American Medical Association (AMA), and online physician directories. The information gathered is cross-referenced and verified to ensure accuracy. The analysis also considers the availability of pharmacies and other healthcare resources within the community.
The analysis also considers the specific challenges faced by asthma patients in Baconton. These challenges may include limited access to specialists, transportation difficulties, and socioeconomic factors. The Asthma Score reflects the ability of the healthcare system to address these challenges.
The final Asthma Score provides a valuable assessment of the asthma care landscape in Baconton. It identifies areas of strength and weakness, highlighting opportunities for improvement. The findings can inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members about the resources available to asthma patients.
The Asthma Score serves as a starting point for improving asthma care in Baconton. The score can be used to track progress over time, identify best practices, and advocate for necessary changes. By understanding the current state of asthma care, stakeholders can work together to create a healthier community for asthma patients.
The analysis can be used to inform decisions about healthcare investments, resource allocation, and community health initiatives. It can also be used to educate patients about the healthcare options available to them. The Asthma Score is a dynamic tool that can be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
The final report includes recommendations for improving asthma care in Baconton. These recommendations may include increasing the number of PCPs, expanding telemedicine services, integrating mental health care, and implementing patient education programs. The goal is to improve the Asthma Score and enhance the quality of life for asthma patients.
Are you interested in visualizing the healthcare landscape of Baconton and beyond? Explore the power of geographical data with CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping tools allow you to analyze healthcare access, physician distribution, and other critical factors, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the health of their community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like