39846, Edison, Georgia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39846, Edison, Georgia is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.45 percent of the residents in 39846 has some form of health insurance. 54.39 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 40.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39846 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 480 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39846. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 332 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 95 health care providers accessible to residents in 39846, Edison, Georgia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Edison, Georgia (ZIP Code 39846)

This analysis provides an assessment of asthma care availability and quality for residents of Edison, Georgia, specifically focusing on the ZIP code 39846. The evaluation incorporates factors like physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components of comprehensive asthma management. The goal is to understand the landscape of care and identify potential areas for improvement.

Edison, a small community in Calhoun County, faces unique challenges in healthcare access due to its rural setting. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a foundational element of asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education are all facilitated by a strong PCP network. The physician-to-patient ratio in 39846 is a key indicator of access. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Georgia Department of Public Health are crucial for determining this ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to care, particularly for those with chronic conditions like asthma. This data would then be compared to state and national averages to provide context.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is important. Are physicians clustered in one area, creating potential geographic barriers for some residents? Are there transportation challenges that further limit access? Examining the location of practices and their proximity to patient populations is essential. Furthermore, the presence of specialists, such as pulmonologists or allergists, is a significant factor. While PCPs often manage asthma, access to specialists is vital for complex cases or for patients who are not responding well to initial treatments. The availability of these specialists, and their willingness to accept new patients, directly impacts the quality of care available in Edison.

Evaluating the practices themselves requires a deeper dive. Are practices accepting new patients? What is the average wait time for an appointment? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate patients' schedules? Patient reviews and feedback are valuable sources of information, providing insights into the patient experience, including communication, wait times, and the overall quality of care. The practices' approach to asthma education is also critical. Do they provide patients with information about triggers, medication management, and emergency action plans? These educational components are essential for empowering patients to manage their condition effectively.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for expanding healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. The adoption of telemedicine by practices in 39846 is a key area of assessment. Does the practice offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments or medication refills? Telemedicine can reduce the need for in-person visits, saving patients time and travel costs. The availability of remote monitoring tools, such as peak flow meters that transmit data electronically, can further enhance asthma management. Assessing the practices' telemedicine capabilities, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is a crucial element of this analysis.

Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact mental health. Anxiety and depression are common among asthma patients, and these conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms. The availability of mental health resources within the community is therefore a critical factor in overall asthma care. Are there mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, who are accessible to patients in Edison? Do practices have referral pathways to these resources? Integrated care, where mental health services are offered within the primary care setting, can improve access and coordination of care. Evaluating the presence of these resources and the level of integration is an important aspect of the analysis.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is a key objective. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, offer innovative services, and have a strong track record of positive patient outcomes should be recognized. This recognition can encourage other practices to adopt similar practices and improve the overall quality of care in the community. The criteria for identifying standout practices would include factors like patient satisfaction scores, adherence to evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, and the adoption of telemedicine and other innovative technologies.

The evaluation of asthma care in Edison, Georgia, requires a multi-faceted approach. Assessing physician-to-patient ratios, examining practice characteristics, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and investigating the availability of mental health resources provides a comprehensive picture of the landscape of care. The analysis should provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the current system and identify areas for improvement. This information can be used to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members about the needs of asthma patients in Edison and to promote the development of a more accessible and effective healthcare system.

The analysis would also need to consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma outcomes. Poverty, housing quality, and environmental factors can all contribute to asthma triggers and exacerbate symptoms. Data on these factors should be integrated into the analysis to provide a more complete understanding of the challenges faced by asthma patients in Edison.

Finally, the analysis should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with actionable recommendations for improving asthma care in Edison. This could include recommendations for increasing the number of PCPs, expanding telemedicine services, or improving access to mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to improve the health and well-being of asthma patients in the community.

For a visual representation of these findings, including physician locations, patient demographics, and access to resources, explore interactive maps.

Visit CartoChrome maps to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the asthma care landscape in Edison, Georgia.