The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 41660, Teaberry, Kentucky is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 41660 has some form of health insurance. 73.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 26.02 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 41660 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 236 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 41660. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,174 health care providers accessible to residents in 41660, Teaberry, Kentucky.
Health Scores in 41660, Teaberry, Kentucky
Asthma Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 43 |
Provider Score | 90 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 37 |
41660 | Teaberry | Kentucky | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 41660 and Primary Care in Teaberry
This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care and primary care access within ZIP code 41660, encompassing the community of Teaberry, Kentucky. The objective is to evaluate the available resources, focusing on factors impacting asthma management and overall healthcare accessibility. We will consider physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, culminating in a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare ecosystem.
The cornerstone of effective asthma management lies in the availability of qualified medical professionals. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. While precise figures fluctuate, the ratio in rural areas like Teaberry often lags behind national averages. This means fewer doctors are available to serve a potentially larger population, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromised access to specialized asthma care. Identifying the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists actively practicing within 41660 is fundamental. Data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and state medical boards, combined with insurance provider directories, can paint a clearer picture of the current ratio. This data is critical for understanding the baseline level of care available.
Within the context of limited physician availability, identifying standout practices becomes even more significant. Practices that prioritize asthma management, offering specialized services like pulmonary function testing or asthma education programs, should be highlighted. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive patient care. Evaluating their operational models, including appointment scheduling, patient communication strategies, and the integration of electronic health records (EHRs), is also essential. Are they accepting new patients? Do they have dedicated asthma nurses or respiratory therapists on staff? The answers to these questions can significantly impact a patient's experience and the quality of their asthma care.
The adoption of telemedicine has the potential to bridge the geographical gap and improve access to care, particularly in rural settings. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine implementation among practices in 41660 is critical. Do physicians offer virtual consultations for routine check-ups, medication management, or follow-up appointments? Telemedicine can be especially beneficial for asthma patients, enabling them to monitor their condition remotely, receive timely advice, and avoid unnecessary trips to the clinic. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a forward-thinking approach to patient care and can significantly improve accessibility.
Furthermore, the integration of mental health resources into asthma care is increasingly recognized as vital. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively affect overall health. Assessing the availability of mental health services within the practices or in the broader community is crucial. Do practices offer on-site counseling or have referral pathways to mental health professionals? Are there resources available to address the psychological impact of asthma? The presence of these resources indicates a holistic approach to patient care.
The analysis should also consider the availability of asthma education programs. These programs empower patients with the knowledge and skills needed to manage their condition effectively. They often cover topics such as medication use, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans. Identifying practices that offer these programs, or collaborate with organizations that do, is a key indicator of a commitment to patient education and self-management.
Primary care availability in Teaberry is intrinsically linked to the quality of asthma care. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients. Their ability to provide initial diagnoses, initiate treatment plans, and coordinate care with specialists is critical. Assessing the number of PCPs accepting new patients, their appointment availability, and their familiarity with asthma management guidelines is essential. Any gaps in primary care access can directly impact the ability of asthma patients to receive timely and appropriate care.
The evaluation should also consider the socio-economic factors influencing healthcare access in Teaberry. Poverty, lack of transportation, and limited access to insurance can all create barriers to care. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions to improve healthcare outcomes. This includes identifying resources that provide financial assistance, transportation support, or insurance enrollment assistance to those in need.
The overall Asthma Score for doctors in 41660 and primary care availability in Teaberry would be a composite of the above factors. It would reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the availability of asthma education programs. A higher score would indicate better access to care and a more supportive healthcare environment for asthma patients.
The final assessment should provide actionable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members. It should highlight areas of strength and identify areas where improvements are needed. This could involve recommendations for increasing the number of healthcare providers, expanding telemedicine services, or promoting the integration of mental health resources.
The analysis is dynamic and should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. Ongoing monitoring of physician availability, the implementation of new technologies, and the evolution of best practices are critical for ensuring that asthma patients in Teaberry receive the best possible care.
Ultimately, this analysis seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare resources available to asthma patients in 41660 and Teaberry. It aims to inform decision-making and drive improvements in healthcare access and quality.
To visualize the data, analyze geographical patterns, and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 41660 and beyond, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare access points, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma care. **Visit CartoChrome today to explore the possibilities!**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like