The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 01835, Haverhill, Massachusetts is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.48 percent of the residents in 01835 has some form of health insurance. 30.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01835 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,850 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01835. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,905 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,115 health care providers accessible to residents in 01835, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01835, Haverhill, Massachusetts
Asthma Score | 56 |
---|---|
People Score | 31 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 18 |
Travel Score | 75 |
01835 | Haverhill | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Haverhill, MA (ZIP Code 01835)
This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within Haverhill, Massachusetts (ZIP Code 01835), assessing the availability and quality of primary care services, with a specific focus on asthma management. We will explore physician-to-patient ratios, highlight notable practices, examine telemedicine integration, and evaluate the presence of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' perspective.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and responsive primary care. Haverhill's population, coupled with the prevalence of asthma, necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure. Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator. While precise, real-time figures fluctuate, publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), can be utilized to estimate these ratios. A lower ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally signifies greater access. Analyzing the ratio within 01835 and comparing it to state and national averages provides a critical benchmark. A deficit in this area warrants investigation into potential solutions, such as incentivizing new physician recruitment or expanding existing practices.
Several primary care practices within Haverhill likely demonstrate commendable asthma care practices. Identifying these "standout" practices involves examining factors like patient reviews, accreditation status (e.g., National Committee for Quality Assurance – NCQA), and participation in quality improvement programs. Practices actively involved in asthma education, offering comprehensive asthma action plans, and routinely monitoring patient lung function (spirometry) are prime candidates. Furthermore, practices that collaborate effectively with pulmonologists and allergists, facilitating seamless referrals, contribute significantly to improved patient outcomes. These practices often have dedicated staff members, such as asthma educators or certified respiratory therapists, enhancing the quality of care.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in modern healthcare, especially in managing chronic conditions like asthma. The adoption of telemedicine within Haverhill's primary care practices should be assessed. Practices offering virtual consultations for medication refills, symptom management, and follow-up appointments provide enhanced convenience and accessibility, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Telemedicine can also facilitate remote monitoring of lung function through connected devices, allowing for proactive intervention and preventing exacerbations. Analyzing the types of telemedicine services offered, the technology infrastructure in place, and patient satisfaction with these services are crucial aspects of the assessment.
The intricate link between asthma and mental health necessitates careful consideration. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Conversely, mental health issues can exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder effective management. Evaluating the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is vital. This includes assessing whether practices offer integrated behavioral health services, have partnerships with mental health providers, or provide referrals to mental health specialists. The presence of mental health screening tools and support groups specifically tailored to asthma patients further enhances the overall care provided.
A comprehensive 'Asthma Score' for Haverhill would synthesize these factors. It would incorporate data on physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The score could be presented on a scale, allowing for easy comparison with other geographic areas. The final score should be used to identify areas for improvement, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the asthma care landscape.
The evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios should also consider the distribution of physicians within the ZIP code. Are physicians concentrated in certain areas, leaving other areas underserved? This geographic analysis is crucial for understanding accessibility challenges. Additionally, the demographics of the patient population, including age, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage, must be considered. These factors can influence access to care and the effectiveness of asthma management strategies.
The assessment of "standout" practices should extend beyond basic metrics. It should include an evaluation of patient education materials, the availability of bilingual services (given the demographic makeup of Haverhill), and the practice's commitment to continuous quality improvement. Practices that actively participate in research or clinical trials related to asthma management demonstrate a commitment to advancing the field.
Telemedicine adoption should be evaluated not only for its availability but also for its effectiveness. Are patients utilizing telemedicine services, and are they satisfied with the care they receive? Data on patient outcomes, such as the frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, should be analyzed to assess the impact of telemedicine on asthma management.
The integration of mental health resources should be assessed in terms of both availability and utilization. Are patients being screened for mental health issues, and are they receiving the support they need? The presence of support groups and educational programs can significantly improve patient outcomes.
Finally, the 'Asthma Score' should be a dynamic measure, subject to regular review and updates. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and new technologies and best practices are emerging. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that the 'Asthma Score' accurately reflects the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Haverhill. This ongoing process will allow for informed decision-making and continuous improvement in the care of asthma patients.
To gain a visual understanding of the distribution of primary care physicians, the location of specialist practices, and the availability of resources across Haverhill, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can provide a dynamic, interactive, and visually engaging representation of this data, offering valuable insights for healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like