02559, Pocasset, Massachusetts Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02559, Pocasset, Massachusetts is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.89 percent of the residents in 02559 has some form of health insurance. 49.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02559 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 372 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02559. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,258 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,071 health care providers accessible to residents in 02559, Pocasset, Massachusetts.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 02559 & Primary Care in Pocasset

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 02559 (Pocasset, Massachusetts) requires a multifaceted approach, particularly when assessing the availability and quality of care for conditions like asthma. This analysis will delve into the specific aspects of primary care, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, offering insights into the accessibility and effectiveness of care for asthma patients in this specific geographic area.

The foundation of effective asthma management rests upon readily available and high-quality primary care. This is where the initial diagnosis, ongoing monitoring, and medication management typically occur. Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio in Pocasset is crucial. A high ratio (fewer doctors per capita) can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed interventions. Conversely, a lower ratio (more doctors) generally indicates better access to care. Publicly available data from sources like the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, combined with information from insurance providers, can provide estimates of the physician-to-patient ratio within 02559. This data point directly impacts the "Accessibility" component of our Asthma Score.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care practices is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves examining factors such as patient satisfaction scores (often available through online reviews and patient surveys), the utilization of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data management and care coordination, and the adoption of evidence-based asthma management guidelines. Practices demonstrating a commitment to these elements are likely to provide superior care. We can assess this by looking at accreditation status, awards, and physician certifications related to asthma management. The "Quality of Care" component of the Asthma Score will reflect these practice-specific attributes.

Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool for improving healthcare access, particularly in geographically isolated areas or for patients with mobility limitations. Its relevance to asthma care is substantial. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of lung function, facilitating proactive asthma management. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in Pocasset is essential. Practices offering virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools, and patient portals will receive a higher score in the "Technology Integration" component of the Asthma Score. This factor directly impacts the "Convenience" aspect of care.

The intricate relationship between asthma and mental health demands consideration. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Conversely, psychological distress can exacerbate asthma symptoms. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices is crucial. This includes access to on-site therapists, referral networks to mental health specialists, and the integration of mental health screenings into routine care. Practices that actively address the mental health needs of their asthma patients will contribute positively to the "Holistic Care" component of the Asthma Score.

The Asthma Score itself is a composite metric, combining the above-mentioned components: Accessibility (physician-to-patient ratio), Quality of Care (practice characteristics), Technology Integration (telemedicine adoption), and Holistic Care (mental health resources). Each component will be weighted based on its perceived importance in delivering effective asthma care. For example, accessibility might be weighted more heavily than technology integration, as it is the fundamental building block. The final score will be a numerical representation of the overall quality of asthma care available in Pocasset, providing a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

To illustrate, a hypothetical practice in 02559 might receive a high score for Quality of Care based on excellent patient satisfaction ratings and the use of EHRs. However, if the physician-to-patient ratio in the area is high, the Accessibility score might be lower, impacting the overall Asthma Score. Conversely, a practice with excellent telemedicine capabilities might receive a higher score in Technology Integration, offsetting potential weaknesses in other areas. The final Asthma Score will be a holistic assessment, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in relation to asthma care.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the specific needs of the asthma patient population in Pocasset. This includes factors such as age distribution, socioeconomic status, and the prevalence of environmental triggers (e.g., allergens, air quality). Understanding these factors can inform the development of targeted interventions and improve the effectiveness of asthma management strategies. This population-specific data will inform the "Contextual Factors" portion of the analysis.

The evaluation process should also include a review of available asthma education resources in the area. These resources might include patient education materials provided by primary care practices, asthma support groups, and community health programs. The availability and accessibility of these resources are crucial for empowering patients to self-manage their condition effectively. The "Patient Empowerment" component of the Asthma Score will reflect the availability and quality of these educational resources.

Finally, the analysis should acknowledge the dynamic nature of healthcare. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatment approaches, and policy changes emerging regularly. Therefore, the Asthma Score should be viewed as a snapshot in time, requiring periodic updates to reflect the changing realities of asthma care in Pocasset. The process of data collection and analysis should be designed to facilitate ongoing monitoring and evaluation.

In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis, culminating in an Asthma Score for doctors in ZIP code 02559 and primary care availability in Pocasset, will provide a valuable assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in the area. The score will be a useful tool for patients seeking care, for healthcare providers striving to improve their services, and for policymakers seeking to allocate resources effectively.

Ready to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Pocasset and beyond? Explore the power of geospatial analysis with CartoChrome maps. **Click here to see how CartoChrome can transform your data into actionable insights.**