02647, Hyannis Port, Massachusetts Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02647, Hyannis Port, Massachusetts is 83 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 02647 has some form of health insurance. 24.70 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 95.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02647 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02647. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 41 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 947 health care providers accessible to residents in 02647, Hyannis Port, Massachusetts.

The analysis of asthma care in Hyannis Port, Massachusetts (ZIP code 02647), requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians, the specific practices within the area, their adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, all within the context of providing effective asthma management. This analysis aims to provide an ‘Asthma Score’ ranking, though a numerical score is not feasible within this format. Instead, we will assess strengths and weaknesses, offering a qualitative evaluation.

Primary care physician availability is a critical starting point. High physician-to-patient ratios can strain resources, leading to longer wait times and potentially less individualized care. The population density of Hyannis Port, combined with the seasonal influx of tourists, creates a dynamic that can impact access. While specific physician-to-patient ratios require detailed data, we can assume that the availability of primary care physicians is a key factor influencing the quality of asthma care in the area. Any shortage would negatively impact the ‘Asthma Score’.

Within the 02647 ZIP code, identifying standout practices is paramount. We need to consider the following factors: the expertise of the physicians, the availability of specialized equipment for asthma diagnosis and management (such as spirometry), and the practice’s commitment to patient education. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, both for patients and their families, would receive a higher ranking. A practice that offers comprehensive asthma action plans, tailored to individual patient needs, is also a significant advantage.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element of the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis. Telemedicine offers significant advantages in asthma management, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and patient education. Practices that utilize telemedicine platforms, enabling remote monitoring of symptoms and virtual consultations, would be viewed favorably. This is especially relevant for patients with frequent exacerbations or those living in areas with limited access to in-person care. The ability to provide quick and easy access to a physician via video or phone can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked in asthma management, but it is essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health professionals, either in-house or through referrals, will receive a higher ranking. This could include on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, or simply a proactive approach to screening patients for mental health concerns. Addressing the psychological impact of asthma is a crucial component of holistic care.

Specific practices within Hyannis Port, and their individual approaches to asthma management, are crucial to the overall ‘Asthma Score’. Without specific practice names, a general assessment is possible. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitor patient adherence to treatment protocols would be highly ranked. A practice that provides quick access to appointments, or offers after-hours support, would also be viewed positively. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient data and facilitating communication is another important factor.

The presence of specialized asthma clinics or allergy specialists within the area is also relevant. These specialists often have a deeper understanding of asthma and can provide more advanced treatments, such as immunotherapy. The availability of these specialists, and the ease of access to their services, would positively impact the ‘Asthma Score’. A practice that actively collaborates with specialists, ensuring seamless referrals and coordinated care, would be highly valued.

The ‘Asthma Score’ also considers the practice's responsiveness to patient needs. This includes the ease of scheduling appointments, the responsiveness of the staff to patient inquiries, and the availability of after-hours care. Practices that prioritize patient communication and provide clear and concise information will be ranked higher. A practice that actively solicits patient feedback and uses it to improve its services is also a positive indicator.

Another important aspect of the ‘Asthma Score’ is the practice's commitment to preventative care. This includes providing flu shots, pneumococcal vaccinations, and other preventative measures that can help to reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations. Practices that actively promote preventative care and educate patients about the importance of these measures will be viewed favorably.

Finally, the ‘Asthma Score’ will also consider the practice's overall commitment to quality improvement. This includes regularly reviewing patient outcomes, tracking asthma control rates, and implementing strategies to improve care. Practices that are committed to continuous improvement and actively seek to enhance their services will be ranked higher.

In conclusion, assessing asthma care in Hyannis Port requires a nuanced understanding of several factors. Primary care physician availability, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the commitment to patient education are all critical components. The ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, while qualitative in this context, suggests that practices prioritizing comprehensive care, utilizing technology, and addressing the psychological impact of asthma will likely provide the best outcomes for patients.

For a more detailed and geographically-informed analysis, including specific practice locations, patient demographics, and resource availability, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent the distribution of healthcare resources, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of asthma care within the 02647 ZIP code.