38646, Marks, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 38646, Marks, Mississippi is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.88 percent of the residents in 38646 has some form of health insurance. 48.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 43.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38646 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 620 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38646. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 490 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 501 health care providers accessible to residents in 38646, Marks, Mississippi.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38646 and Primary Care Availability in Marks, Mississippi**

The health landscape of Marks, Mississippi, specifically within the 38646 ZIP code, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities when evaluating asthma care and primary care accessibility. This analysis delves into the available resources, physician-to-patient ratios, and the adoption of modern healthcare practices, culminating in a comprehensive asthma score assessment. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the current situation and identify areas for improvement, ultimately benefiting the residents of Marks.

The foundation of any robust healthcare system lies in the availability of primary care physicians. In Marks, the primary care landscape directly impacts asthma management. Regular check-ups with a primary care physician are critical for early asthma diagnosis, ongoing monitoring, and the coordination of care. The availability of these physicians, therefore, is a key determinant of the asthma score. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care providers, would negatively impact the score. Conversely, a higher ratio, suggesting greater access, would contribute positively. This assessment needs to consider the overall population of the area and the number of practicing primary care physicians.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. Determining this ratio requires gathering data on the total population within the 38646 ZIP code and the number of practicing primary care physicians. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure can provide this information. Once the ratio is calculated, it can be compared to national or state averages. A ratio significantly higher than the average suggests a shortage of primary care physicians, which will impact the asthma score negatively. This shortage can lead to delayed appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potential exacerbation of asthma symptoms.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care and asthma management is essential. The assessment should identify standout practices within the 38646 ZIP code. These practices might have specialized expertise in asthma care, utilize evidence-based treatment protocols, and demonstrate a commitment to patient education. Identifying these practices involves reviewing patient testimonials, examining online reviews, and potentially contacting local healthcare organizations for recommendations. The presence of such practices would positively influence the asthma score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the evaluation. Telemedicine offers several advantages, especially in rural areas. It can increase access to specialists, facilitate remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and reduce the need for frequent in-person visits. The asthma score will reflect the degree of telemedicine adoption by primary care practices and specialists in the area. Practices that offer telehealth services will receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and improved access to care. Information about telemedicine adoption can be obtained through practice websites, direct inquiries, and potentially through state healthcare initiatives.

Asthma, like many chronic conditions, can significantly impact mental health. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial aspect of comprehensive asthma care. The assessment must evaluate the presence of mental health providers, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed counselors, within the 38646 ZIP code or accessible through referral networks. The proximity of these resources, their acceptance of insurance, and their specialization in treating patients with chronic illnesses will all factor into the asthma score. The presence of integrated mental health services within primary care practices would be a significant positive factor.

Assessing the availability of asthma-specific resources is also necessary. This includes access to certified asthma educators, respiratory therapists, and specialized asthma clinics. The presence of these resources demonstrates a commitment to providing comprehensive asthma care and improving patient outcomes. Information on these resources can be gathered through local healthcare directories, patient advocacy groups, and direct inquiries to local healthcare providers. The availability of these resources will positively influence the asthma score.

The overall asthma score for the 38646 ZIP code will be a composite measure, reflecting the factors discussed above. The score will be a relative measure, potentially using a scale that considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of asthma-specific resources. The score will provide a snapshot of the current situation, highlighting areas of strength and weakness. The score can also be used to track progress over time as healthcare initiatives are implemented.

The analysis process involves gathering data from various sources, including public health agencies, healthcare providers, and patient advocacy groups. This data must be compiled, analyzed, and interpreted to create a comprehensive assessment. The process requires careful attention to detail and a commitment to accuracy. The final asthma score will provide a valuable tool for healthcare providers, policymakers, and residents of Marks to understand the current state of asthma care and identify areas for improvement.

The assessment will also consider the socioeconomic factors that influence asthma prevalence and management. Factors like poverty, housing conditions, and environmental exposures can significantly impact asthma outcomes. The analysis should consider these factors to provide a more complete picture of the challenges faced by asthma patients in Marks. This will involve gathering data on socioeconomic indicators and environmental factors and incorporating them into the overall assessment.

The final analysis should be presented in a clear and concise manner, using visualizations like charts and graphs to highlight key findings. The report should include specific recommendations for improving asthma care in Marks. These recommendations might include increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, improving access to mental health resources, and implementing asthma education programs. The report should also identify potential funding sources and partnerships to support these initiatives.

The goal of this analysis is to provide a roadmap for improving asthma care in Marks, Mississippi. By understanding the current situation and identifying areas for improvement, healthcare providers, policymakers, and residents can work together to create a healthier community. This is an ongoing process, and the asthma score should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This will help to ensure that the community continues to make progress in providing high-quality asthma care.

The insights from this analysis can be further enhanced and visualized using spatial data. To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and their accessibility within the 38646 ZIP code, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visualize the physician-to-patient ratios, the locations of healthcare facilities, and the distribution of asthma prevalence, providing a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape and identifying areas of greatest need.