38650, Myrtle, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 38650, Myrtle, Mississippi is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.39 percent of the residents in 38650 has some form of health insurance. 42.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38650 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,365 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38650. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 820 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 861 health care providers accessible to residents in 38650, Myrtle, Mississippi.

Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38650 & Primary Care in Myrtle

Analyzing the accessibility and quality of asthma care within ZIP Code 38650, encompassing the town of Myrtle, Mississippi, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers physician availability, practice characteristics, and resource integration, culminating in a comprehensive Asthma Score assessment. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in this specific geographic area.

The cornerstone of effective asthma management is readily available primary care. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio in Myrtle is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the Mississippi State Department of Health and the US Census Bureau, alongside information from healthcare directories, can help determine the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the 38650 ZIP code. This data, combined with the population figures for Myrtle, allows for calculating a ratio, indicating the number of patients per PCP. A lower ratio suggests better access. However, this ratio alone doesn't tell the whole story.

The quality of care extends beyond mere numbers. Evaluating the characteristics of local primary care practices is essential. Are they accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to accommodate varying patient schedules? Do they have dedicated asthma specialists or staff trained in asthma management? Practices with these attributes generally score higher. Furthermore, the availability of on-site diagnostic tools, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT), streamlines the diagnostic and monitoring process, improving patient outcomes.

Telemedicine adoption presents another critical factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve asthma care accessibility, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms for asthma management, including medication refills, education, and symptom monitoring, receive a higher score. The ease of access to a physician, even remotely, can prevent exacerbations and improve overall patient well-being.

Beyond the physical aspects of care, the integration of mental health resources plays a significant role in asthma management. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental and emotional well-being. Practices that recognize this and offer or refer patients to mental health services, such as counseling or support groups, demonstrate a commitment to holistic care. The availability of these resources can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and enhance their quality of life.

Identifying standout practices within the 38650 ZIP code is crucial. Practices that demonstrate excellence in asthma care, through factors such as high patient satisfaction scores, adherence to evidence-based guidelines, and proactive patient education, should be highlighted. Reviewing patient testimonials, if available, can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and the quality of care provided. These practices serve as models for other providers in the area.

The Asthma Score, ultimately, is a composite metric. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the characteristics of local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. Each factor is assigned a weighted value based on its importance in asthma management. The higher the score, the better the overall asthma care landscape within the specified area. This score provides a valuable tool for patients seeking care, healthcare providers striving to improve their services, and policymakers aiming to address healthcare gaps.

Specific data points for Myrtle, Mississippi, are necessary to calculate the exact Asthma Score. The analysis would incorporate the number of PCPs in the area, the average patient load per physician, the availability of extended hours and weekend appointments, the existence of on-site diagnostic tools, the adoption of telemedicine platforms, and the availability of mental health services. This data would be compiled from various sources, including healthcare directories, public health records, and direct contact with local practices.

For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio in Myrtle is high, the score would be negatively impacted. Conversely, if a significant number of practices offer telemedicine options and integrate mental health resources, the score would improve. Standout practices, with high patient satisfaction and adherence to asthma guidelines, would further boost the overall score.

The final Asthma Score for ZIP Code 38650 would be a numerical value, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in the area. This score, along with the supporting data, would provide a comprehensive overview of the local healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers.

The dynamic nature of healthcare necessitates ongoing monitoring and updates to the Asthma Score. Regular reviews, incorporating new data and changes in practice characteristics, ensure the score remains accurate and relevant. This continuous assessment helps track improvements in asthma care and identifies areas requiring further attention.

To visualize and better understand the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including the location of physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies, consider using interactive mapping tools. These tools allow users to explore the healthcare landscape visually, identifying areas with limited access to care. CartoChrome maps offers a powerful platform for this kind of analysis. Explore how CartoChrome maps can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Myrtle and beyond.