38665, Sarah, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 38665, Sarah, Mississippi is 6 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.42 percent of the residents in 38665 has some form of health insurance. 53.49 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 41.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38665 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 835 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38665. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 516 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 465 health care providers accessible to residents in 38665, Sarah, Mississippi.

Asthma management within ZIP code 38665, encompassing Sarah, Mississippi, presents a multifaceted landscape. Evaluating the quality of care necessitates a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, considering factors beyond simple physician counts. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and identify standout practices within the community.

The foundation of asthma care rests upon accessible primary care. Sarah, a small community within 38665, likely faces challenges in this regard. A low primary care physician-to-population ratio, coupled with potential geographical isolation, could hinder timely access to essential preventative care, diagnosis, and treatment. Residents may need to travel significant distances to reach a primary care physician, impacting adherence to treatment plans and increasing the risk of asthma exacerbations. The ‘Asthma Score’ would reflect this accessibility challenge, negatively impacting the overall score.

Physician-to-patient ratios are crucial indicators of healthcare accessibility. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would likely translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests better access, enabling physicians to provide more personalized care and proactively manage asthma. The specific physician-to-patient ratio within 38665, especially in relation to the prevalence of asthma in the population, is a critical component of the ‘Asthma Score’ calculation. Public health data, local hospital records, and insurance claims data would be essential for an accurate assessment.

Identifying standout practices within the community is vital. These practices may demonstrate excellence in asthma management through evidence-based protocols, patient education programs, and a commitment to patient-centered care. They might employ certified asthma educators, utilize standardized asthma action plans, and proactively monitor patients' asthma control. These practices would receive a higher ‘Asthma Score’ reflecting their dedication to providing superior care. The analysis should consider patient satisfaction surveys, asthma-related hospitalization rates, and emergency room visit data to identify these high-performing practices.

Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely, monitor their asthma symptoms, and receive timely interventions. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for asthma management would receive a higher ‘Asthma Score’. The analysis would assess the availability of telehealth services, the types of telemedicine platforms used (e.g., video conferencing, remote monitoring devices), and patient satisfaction with these services.

The integration of mental health resources is another crucial aspect of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health services would receive a higher ‘Asthma Score’. This includes assessing the availability of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to mental health specialists, and educational programs that address the psychological aspects of asthma.

The ‘Asthma Score’ analysis would consider the availability of specialized asthma care, such as pulmonologists and allergists. While primary care physicians often manage asthma, access to specialists is crucial for patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma. The analysis would assess the proximity of specialists, the availability of appointments, and the referral patterns of primary care physicians.

Furthermore, the ‘Asthma Score’ should factor in the availability of patient education resources. Effective asthma management requires patients to understand their condition, triggers, and medications. Practices that provide comprehensive patient education programs, including written materials, online resources, and individual counseling, would receive a higher score. The analysis would evaluate the quality and accessibility of these educational resources.

The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that impact asthma management. Poverty, lack of insurance, and substandard housing can all exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder access to care. The ‘Asthma Score’ would incorporate data on socioeconomic indicators, such as poverty rates, insurance coverage, and housing quality, to provide a more holistic assessment of asthma care within 38665.

In conclusion, the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis for doctors in ZIP code 38665 and primary care availability in Sarah would provide a nuanced understanding of the quality of asthma care in the community. It would highlight areas of strength, identify areas for improvement, and inform strategies to enhance asthma management. This comprehensive assessment would consider physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the identification of standout practices. It would also account for socioeconomic factors and the availability of specialized asthma care and patient education resources.

To visualize this complex data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and asthma prevalence within 38665, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, enabling stakeholders to identify areas of greatest need and develop targeted interventions.