38769, Rosedale, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 38769, Rosedale, Mississippi is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 76.07 percent of the residents in 38769 has some form of health insurance. 60.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 29.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38769 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 501 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38769. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 406 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 354 health care providers accessible to residents in 38769, Rosedale, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Rosedale, MS (ZIP Code 38769)

Analyzing healthcare access and quality in Rosedale, Mississippi (ZIP Code 38769) requires a multifaceted approach, particularly concerning asthma management. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, the potential for telemedicine integration, the presence of mental health resources, and the overall physician-to-patient ratio, culminating in an "Asthma Score" assessment. This score provides a snapshot of the community's preparedness to address asthma, a chronic respiratory condition significantly impacted by access to care.

Rosedale, a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas: limited healthcare infrastructure, physician shortages, and potential difficulties in accessing specialized care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. National averages often don't reflect local realities. In 38769, the ratio is likely higher than the national average, suggesting fewer physicians per capita. This scarcity necessitates careful consideration of how existing resources are allocated and utilized. The availability of primary care physicians is the cornerstone of asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education are vital. The analysis must determine the number of primary care practices within the ZIP code, their capacity, and the types of services they offer. Are they accepting new patients? Do they have specialized staff trained in asthma care?

The presence of standout practices is crucial. These are clinics or individual physicians demonstrating a commitment to asthma care. This might involve employing certified asthma educators, implementing comprehensive asthma action plans, or utilizing advanced diagnostic tools. Identifying these practices and understanding their operational models can inform strategies to improve asthma care across the community. A practice with a strong track record of patient education and adherence to national asthma guidelines would significantly enhance the Asthma Score.

Telemedicine offers a promising avenue for improving access to care, especially in underserved areas. The analysis must assess the adoption of telemedicine by local primary care practices. Do they offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments or medication refills? Telemedicine can reduce travel burdens, improve medication adherence, and provide timely access to healthcare professionals. Its integration can significantly boost the Asthma Score by expanding access to care.

Mental health is inextricably linked to asthma management. Asthma can trigger anxiety and depression, while these conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms. The analysis must investigate the availability of mental health resources within the community. Are there mental health professionals, such as psychologists or psychiatrists, practicing locally? Do primary care practices offer integrated behavioral health services? The presence of accessible mental health support is crucial for holistic asthma care and will positively impact the Asthma Score.

The Asthma Score is not a single number but a composite measure reflecting the various factors discussed. The score will be influenced by the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of primary care, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. A higher score indicates better access to and quality of asthma care. A lower score highlights areas needing improvement.

The analysis must consider the specific challenges faced by Rosedale residents. Transportation limitations, socioeconomic factors, and health literacy levels can all impact asthma management. Understanding these factors is essential for developing targeted interventions. For example, if transportation is a significant barrier, telemedicine adoption becomes even more critical. If health literacy is low, patient education programs must be tailored to meet the community's needs.

The analysis will also consider the availability of asthma-related medications and supplies. Are pharmacies readily accessible? Do they stock a sufficient supply of inhalers, nebulizers, and other essential asthma medications? Access to these resources is fundamental for effective asthma management.

Furthermore, the analysis will examine the community's awareness of asthma. Are there public health campaigns promoting asthma awareness and education? Are schools and workplaces equipped to handle asthma emergencies? Community engagement and education are vital for improving asthma outcomes.

The data collection for this analysis would involve several steps. These include reviewing publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Mississippi State Department of Health, and the U.S. Census Bureau. Direct outreach to local primary care practices and pharmacies would be essential to gather information on services offered, telemedicine adoption, and medication availability. Patient surveys and focus groups could provide valuable insights into the patient experience and identify unmet needs.

The final Asthma Score would be a weighted average, reflecting the relative importance of each factor. For instance, physician-to-patient ratio and primary care availability might carry a higher weight than telemedicine adoption. The weighting would be based on evidence-based best practices and the specific needs of the Rosedale community.

The analysis would culminate in a detailed report outlining the Asthma Score, the methodology used, the key findings, and recommendations for improvement. These recommendations might include strategies to recruit more primary care physicians, promote telemedicine adoption, expand mental health services, and enhance community education efforts. The report would be a valuable resource for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations working to improve asthma care in Rosedale.

The ultimate goal of this analysis is to provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape in Rosedale and to identify areas where resources can be directed to improve asthma outcomes. By understanding the challenges and opportunities, the community can work together to create a healthier environment for all residents. The analysis will provide a roadmap for improving the Asthma Score and ensuring that individuals with asthma receive the care they need to live healthy and fulfilling lives.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Rosedale and other communities? Explore the power of geographic data with CartoChrome maps. Gain insights into physician locations, access to care, and more. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the potential of spatial analysis.