The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 38949, Paris, Mississippi is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 38949 has some form of health insurance. 31.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38949 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 44 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38949. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 104 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 94 health care providers accessible to residents in 38949, Paris, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 38949, Paris, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 77 |
---|---|
People Score | 96 |
Provider Score | 49 |
Hospital Score | 43 |
Travel Score | 44 |
38949 | Paris | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38949 and Primary Care Availability in Paris, TN
The evaluation of asthma care within ZIP code 38949 and the broader primary care landscape of Paris, Tennessee, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, framed as an “Asthma Score,” considers physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of supportive services, including telemedicine and mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment for individuals managing asthma and those seeking primary care in this specific geographic area.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial starting point. Determining the precise number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists (specialists in lung health, including asthma) practicing within ZIP code 38949 and the city of Paris is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state medical boards, along with local hospital directories, can provide this information. However, simply counting physicians is insufficient. The patient population needs to be factored in. A high physician-to-patient ratio could indicate better access to care, while a low ratio might signal potential challenges in scheduling appointments and receiving timely medical attention. The analysis must consider the age distribution of the population, as children and the elderly often have higher healthcare needs, including those related to asthma.
Once physician numbers are established, the focus shifts to practice characteristics. The size of practices, whether they are solo practices, group practices, or affiliated with larger healthcare systems, impacts the resources available. Larger practices often have access to a wider range of specialists, diagnostic equipment, and support staff, such as respiratory therapists and asthma educators. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) is another critical factor. EHRs facilitate better coordination of care, medication management, and communication between physicians and patients. Practices utilizing EHRs can often offer features like online patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical records, request prescription refills, and communicate with their care team.
The presence of standout practices is also important. Identifying practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management, perhaps through specialized asthma clinics, participation in asthma research, or the implementation of patient education programs, would significantly enhance the Asthma Score. These practices might offer comprehensive asthma action plans, provide regular asthma education sessions, and actively monitor patients' asthma control. Patient testimonials and online reviews can provide insights into the quality of care provided by these practices, including the responsiveness of staff, the clarity of communication, and the overall patient experience.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. The availability of telemedicine services allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, which can be especially beneficial for those living in rural areas or facing mobility challenges. Telemedicine can facilitate medication adjustments, monitor asthma symptoms, and provide timely advice without requiring patients to travel to the clinic. The analysis should assess the extent to which physicians in the area offer telemedicine services, including the types of services available (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), the ease of access, and the associated costs.
Mental health resources are a frequently overlooked aspect of asthma care, but they are critically important. Asthma can significantly impact a person’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The analysis needs to evaluate the availability of mental health services within the local healthcare system. This includes the presence of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. Practices that offer integrated behavioral health services, where mental health professionals are embedded within the primary care team, can provide more holistic and coordinated care for patients with asthma.
The availability of specialized asthma services, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT) and allergy testing, also contributes to the Asthma Score. PFTs are essential for diagnosing and monitoring asthma, while allergy testing can help identify triggers that exacerbate asthma symptoms. The analysis should determine the availability of these services within the local healthcare system and the ease with which patients can access them.
Furthermore, the analysis must consider the affordability of care. The cost of healthcare, including physician visits, medications, and diagnostic tests, can be a significant barrier to accessing care, particularly for individuals with limited financial resources. The analysis should consider the acceptance of various insurance plans, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the cost of common asthma medications.
Finally, the analysis should include an assessment of community resources that support asthma management. This includes the availability of asthma education programs, support groups, and community health initiatives. Partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations can enhance asthma awareness, promote self-management skills, and improve overall asthma control within the community.
The final Asthma Score would be a composite metric, weighted based on the relative importance of each factor. This score would provide a concise overview of the healthcare environment for asthma management in the specified geographic area.
To gain a deeper understanding of the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and access to care, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can visualize the location of physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare facilities, along with demographic data, to provide a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like