39054, Cary, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39054, Cary, Mississippi is 33 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.49 percent of the residents in 39054 has some form of health insurance. 43.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 47.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39054 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 91 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39054. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 60 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1 health care providers accessible to residents in 39054, Cary, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Cary, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39054)

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within Cary, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39054) requires a multi-faceted approach, particularly when assessing asthma care. An “Asthma Score,” though not a formal metric, allows for a comparative evaluation of available resources and their impact on patient outcomes. This analysis will consider physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, all crucial elements in managing this chronic respiratory condition.

The primary concern in Cary, and many rural communities, is the limited availability of primary care physicians. A low physician-to-patient ratio directly impacts asthma care. Fewer doctors translate to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment adjustments. This scarcity also strains existing resources, increasing the workload on each physician and potentially reducing the time dedicated to individual patient needs. The current ratio, while difficult to pinpoint precisely without proprietary data, is likely significantly below the national average, placing a considerable burden on the few primary care providers serving the area.

Within this limited pool, understanding the characteristics of the existing practices is critical. Are there any standout practices within the 39054 ZIP code that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management? This would involve examining their patient volume, the availability of specialized equipment for pulmonary function testing, and the presence of certified asthma educators. Practices with dedicated staff trained in asthma management are likely to provide more comprehensive care, including patient education on triggers, medication adherence, and proper inhaler technique. The presence of such resources, however, may be limited given the rural setting.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in assessing the Asthma Score. Telemedicine offers a potential solution to the geographic barriers inherent in rural healthcare. Remote consultations, medication refills, and follow-up appointments can significantly improve access to care for asthma patients. Examining the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine is crucial. Are they utilizing video conferencing for patient visits? Do they offer remote monitoring of peak flow meters or other respiratory devices? Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine are likely to achieve a higher Asthma Score, as they can provide more consistent and accessible care.

Furthermore, the integration of mental health resources is vital. Asthma, being a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities. The availability of mental health support, whether through on-site therapists, referrals to local mental health providers, or integrated behavioral health programs, is a critical component of comprehensive asthma care. The absence of such resources would negatively impact the Asthma Score, as it indicates a potential gap in addressing the holistic needs of patients.

Assessing primary care availability in Cary necessitates a deeper dive into the specifics. Are there any federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or rural health clinics (RHCs) operating within the ZIP code? These facilities often provide essential services to underserved populations, including asthma management. Examining their staffing levels, service offerings, and patient volume provides a clearer picture of the primary care landscape. The presence of these clinics can significantly improve the Asthma Score by increasing access to care for those who might otherwise face significant barriers.

The success of asthma management also depends on the availability of ancillary services. Are there local pharmacies that carry a wide range of asthma medications and provide patient counseling on proper usage? Is there access to respiratory therapists who can provide specialized care and education? The availability of these supporting services contributes to a higher Asthma Score, as they enhance the overall quality of care and support patient adherence to treatment plans.

The analysis must also consider the social determinants of health. Factors such as housing quality, exposure to environmental pollutants, and socioeconomic status can significantly impact asthma outcomes. Are there community programs addressing these issues? Are there initiatives to improve housing conditions or reduce exposure to environmental triggers? Addressing these broader social factors is essential for improving the Asthma Score and ensuring that all patients have the opportunity to thrive.

Evaluating the Asthma Score requires a careful examination of the local healthcare ecosystem. The limited availability of physicians, the extent of telemedicine adoption, the presence of mental health resources, and the integration of ancillary services all contribute to the overall quality of care. The absence of these resources would negatively impact the Asthma Score, as it indicates a potential gap in addressing the holistic needs of patients.

The evaluation of the primary care landscape in Cary requires a comprehensive approach, considering both the availability of physicians and the quality of care provided. The limited resources within the 39054 ZIP code necessitate a focus on innovative solutions, such as telemedicine and community-based programs, to improve asthma management and patient outcomes. The effectiveness of these interventions can be visualized and analyzed using advanced mapping tools.

Understanding the healthcare landscape in Cary, Mississippi, is crucial for improving the lives of asthma patients. The challenges are significant, but with strategic planning and a focus on patient-centered care, positive changes can be made.