39067, Ethel, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39067, Ethel, Mississippi is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.18 percent of the residents in 39067 has some form of health insurance. 51.70 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39067 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 310 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39067. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 250 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 358 health care providers accessible to residents in 39067, Ethel, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Ethel, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39067)

This analysis provides an asthma care landscape assessment for Ethel, Mississippi, specifically focusing on primary care physician availability and the overall quality of care accessible to residents within ZIP code 39067. The goal is to understand the resources available for asthma management, including physician accessibility, innovative care models, and the integration of mental health support, ultimately leading to a comprehensive “Asthma Score” evaluation.

The core of this assessment hinges on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Ethel, being a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas, including a potential shortage of healthcare providers. Physician-to-patient ratios are crucial. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians serving a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care quality. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the Mississippi State Department of Health will be examined to estimate the PCP-to-population ratio within the 39067 ZIP code and the surrounding areas that residents might access. This data will be cross-referenced with information on the prevalence of asthma within the local population to understand the potential strain on the existing healthcare infrastructure.

Beyond the raw numbers of physicians, the quality of care offered by the available PCPs is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices’ approaches to asthma management. Key indicators include the utilization of evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, the frequency of asthma action plan development, and the consistent monitoring of patients' asthma control levels. We will assess the availability of spirometry testing, a critical tool for assessing lung function, within the primary care settings. Further, the ability to provide timely referrals to pulmonologists, specialists in lung diseases, is a vital component of comprehensive asthma care.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. This involves recognizing those primary care clinics that demonstrate exceptional commitment to asthma care. This might include practices that have implemented patient education programs, actively engage in asthma-related community outreach, or have consistently achieved positive patient outcomes, such as reduced hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These practices serve as models for others and can provide valuable insights into best practices for asthma management in a rural setting. Publicly available patient satisfaction surveys and reviews, while often limited in scope, will be considered to gauge patient experiences with the care received.

The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in this assessment. Telemedicine, or telehealth, offers a powerful tool for expanding access to care, especially in rural areas where geographical barriers can significantly impede access to physicians. The analysis will evaluate the extent to which PCPs in the 39067 ZIP code and surrounding areas utilize telemedicine for asthma management. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and the use of telehealth platforms for patient education and follow-up care. Telemedicine's potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs will be a key consideration.

The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked in asthma management, but it is increasingly recognized as a critical component of holistic care. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health support services within the primary care practices and the broader community. This includes evaluating whether PCPs screen patients for mental health issues, the availability of on-site or readily accessible mental health professionals, and the presence of referral pathways to mental health specialists. The degree to which mental health services are integrated into asthma care will significantly influence the overall Asthma Score.

Specifics regarding the actual physicians and clinics will be gathered from various sources, including online directories, insurance provider lists, and publicly available information. The analysis will aim to identify the names of PCPs practicing within the 39067 ZIP code and the surrounding areas, along with their clinic affiliations and contact information. This will allow for a more granular assessment of the resources available to residents. However, due to privacy regulations and the limitations of publicly available data, it is important to acknowledge that the analysis may not be fully comprehensive.

The final "Asthma Score" will be a composite metric reflecting the various factors discussed above. It will take into account the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of asthma care provided by PCPs, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score will provide a snapshot of the current asthma care landscape in Ethel and will highlight areas where improvements are needed. This score will be a valuable tool for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers in their efforts to improve asthma management and overall health outcomes within the community.

The limitations of this analysis must be acknowledged. Publicly available data may not always be fully representative of the actual situation on the ground. The analysis relies on information that is publicly accessible and may not capture the full complexity of the healthcare landscape. Furthermore, the analysis is limited to the available data and may not be able to account for all factors that influence asthma care.

For a more interactive and visually engaging understanding of the healthcare landscape in Ethel, Mississippi, and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and the availability of resources, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a dynamic and detailed view of the data, allowing you to visualize the information and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment.