39071, Flora, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39071, Flora, Mississippi is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.28 percent of the residents in 39071 has some form of health insurance. 35.90 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.32 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39071 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,923 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39071. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 812 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,214 health care providers accessible to residents in 39071, Flora, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Flora, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39071)

Analyzing the landscape of asthma care in Flora, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39071) requires a multi-faceted approach. We must evaluate not only the availability of primary care physicians but also the specific resources and practices that impact asthma management. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support.

Flora, a small town, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The limited population base often translates to fewer healthcare providers, potentially affecting access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. The Asthma Score for Flora will be a composite, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses within the community's healthcare ecosystem.

One critical element of the score is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric directly influences access. A lower ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment initiation. Data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio in Flora is crucial. Public health databases and state medical boards are primary sources for this information. The analysis will need to determine the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within the 39071 ZIP code, as well as the estimated population. This allows for a calculation of the ratio, which can then be benchmarked against state and national averages. A significantly higher ratio (fewer doctors per patient) would negatively impact the Asthma Score.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care significantly influences asthma management. Are PCPs well-versed in the latest asthma guidelines? Do they have experience managing complex cases? Identifying standout practices within Flora is essential. This requires research, potentially including patient surveys, reviews, and interviews with healthcare professionals. Practices demonstrating a commitment to asthma care might have dedicated asthma educators, offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing (PFTs), and actively participate in asthma education programs. These practices would contribute positively to the Asthma Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical component. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, making it easier for patients to access care, especially in rural areas. For asthma patients, telemedicine offers the possibility of remote monitoring, medication adjustments, and virtual follow-up appointments. The analysis will assess the availability of telemedicine services among PCPs in Flora. Do they offer virtual consultations? Do they utilize remote monitoring devices to track patient symptoms and medication adherence? Practices embracing telemedicine will receive a higher score in this area.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources is crucial for comprehensive asthma care. The analysis will evaluate the availability of mental health services within Flora. Are there mental health professionals practicing in the area? Do PCPs have established referral pathways for patients experiencing mental health issues related to their asthma? Practices that integrate mental health support will receive a higher score, recognizing the importance of holistic patient care.

Specifics are crucial. The analysis must go beyond generalities. Instead of just saying "some doctors offer telemedicine," it needs to identify *which* doctors offer telemedicine and *what* types of telemedicine services they provide. Instead of saying "mental health resources are available," it needs to specify *which* mental health professionals are available and *how* patients can access their services. This level of detail is essential for a meaningful Asthma Score.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socioeconomic factors impacting asthma prevalence and management in Flora. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and substandard housing conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder effective treatment. The analysis will need to consider these factors, recognizing that social determinants of health play a significant role in asthma outcomes.

The Asthma Score itself will be a numerical rating, potentially on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing the best possible asthma care environment. The score will be derived from a weighted average of the factors discussed above: physician-to-patient ratio, quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health resources. The weighting of each factor will be determined based on its perceived importance in influencing asthma outcomes. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, given its direct impact on access to care.

To improve the Asthma Score, Flora could focus on several key areas. Recruiting more PCPs, particularly those with expertise in asthma management, would be a priority. Encouraging telemedicine adoption among existing practices could improve access to care, especially for patients living in remote areas. Strengthening partnerships between PCPs and mental health professionals would ensure that patients receive comprehensive care. Investing in asthma education programs for both patients and healthcare providers would improve asthma management.

The data gathering phase is paramount. This involves a thorough review of public health data, medical directories, and insurance provider networks. Patient surveys and interviews with healthcare professionals will offer valuable insights into the quality of care and the patient experience. The analysis will need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

Finally, the Asthma Score should be presented in a clear and concise manner. The report should include a summary of the findings, a detailed explanation of the scoring methodology, and specific recommendations for improvement. The report should be easily accessible to healthcare providers, policymakers, and the general public. The goal is to provide a valuable resource that can be used to improve asthma care in Flora, Mississippi.

For visual representation of the data, including physician locations, patient demographics, and environmental factors, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can offer an interactive and informative way to understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and the impact of environmental factors on asthma prevalence.

**Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Flora, Mississippi? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to gain deeper insights into asthma care and other health-related issues.**