The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39074, Forest, Mississippi is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.27 percent of the residents in 39074 has some form of health insurance. 46.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39074 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,920 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39074. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,413 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 292 health care providers accessible to residents in 39074, Forest, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39074, Forest, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 12 |
Provider Score | 12 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 39 |
39074 | Forest | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Forest, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39074)**
Forest, Mississippi, nestled in the heart of Scott County, presents a unique healthcare landscape, particularly concerning asthma management. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care within ZIP code 39074, focusing on factors that influence asthma outcomes. We’ll assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the presence of mental health resources, all crucial elements in providing comprehensive asthma care.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible primary care. In Forest, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of accessibility. While precise figures fluctuate, the area generally reflects a rural healthcare environment, potentially facing challenges in maintaining a sufficient number of primary care physicians. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient-physician interaction time, and difficulties in establishing a consistent care plan. The impact of a lower physician-to-patient ratio is magnified for chronic conditions like asthma, requiring regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education.
Within Forest, several primary care practices are key players in asthma care. Identifying these practices and assessing their specific asthma management strategies is essential. Do these practices employ certified asthma educators? Do they have established protocols for asthma action plans? Do they actively participate in asthma-related community outreach programs? These factors contribute significantly to the overall quality of care. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive asthma assessments, and collaborate with pulmonologists or allergists are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in expanding healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. Its adoption in Forest's primary care practices is a crucial aspect of this analysis. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. Practices that embrace telemedicine can extend their reach, providing care to patients who may face transportation barriers or have difficulty attending in-person appointments. The effectiveness of telemedicine depends on factors such as internet access, patient comfort with technology, and the integration of telemedicine into the existing care workflow.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms, while the burden of managing a chronic condition can negatively impact mental well-being. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referral networks is a vital component of comprehensive asthma care. Do primary care practices in Forest have mental health professionals on staff or readily available for referrals? Are there programs to screen for anxiety and depression in asthma patients? Addressing the mental health needs of asthma patients can significantly improve their overall quality of life and asthma control.
Analyzing the specific asthma management protocols employed by primary care practices is essential. This includes the use of spirometry to assess lung function, the development of personalized asthma action plans, and the education of patients on proper inhaler technique and trigger avoidance. Practices that consistently implement these evidence-based practices are likely to achieve better asthma control rates. Furthermore, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) can streamline asthma management by facilitating data tracking, medication management, and communication between healthcare providers.
Evaluating the presence of specialized asthma care within Forest is another critical factor. While primary care physicians are the first line of defense, access to pulmonologists and allergists is often necessary for complex asthma cases. Does Forest have pulmonologists or allergists? If not, how far do patients have to travel to receive specialized care? The availability of specialists significantly impacts the ability to diagnose and manage severe asthma cases effectively.
The socioeconomic factors within Forest also influence asthma outcomes. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and substandard housing conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms. Primary care practices that are aware of these social determinants of health and actively work to address them through community outreach programs or partnerships with social service agencies are better positioned to improve patient outcomes.
Another consideration is the level of patient education provided by primary care practices. Asthma education is a cornerstone of effective asthma management. Practices that provide comprehensive education on asthma triggers, medication use, and symptom management empower patients to take an active role in their care. This education should be tailored to the individual patient's needs and cultural background.
Furthermore, the integration of technology can improve asthma care. The use of mobile apps to track symptoms, medication adherence, and environmental triggers can provide valuable data to both patients and physicians. Practices that embrace technology to enhance asthma management are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Finally, the overall community environment plays a role. Air quality, exposure to allergens, and access to recreational facilities can all impact asthma control. Primary care practices that are aware of these environmental factors and provide guidance to patients on how to mitigate their impact are contributing to better asthma outcomes.
In conclusion, the assessment of asthma care in Forest, Mississippi, requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources. By understanding these factors, we can gain a comprehensive view of the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in the area.
For a visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Forest, Mississippi, including the location of primary care practices, their services, and potential access challenges, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a dynamic and data-rich perspective, offering valuable insights into the healthcare resources available in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like