39082, Harrisville, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39082, Harrisville, Mississippi is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.98 percent of the residents in 39082 has some form of health insurance. 46.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39082 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 134 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39082. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 130 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 320 health care providers accessible to residents in 39082, Harrisville, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Harrisville, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39082)

Analyzing asthma care within Harrisville, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39082) requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of asthma management provided, and the integration of supportive resources. This analysis will provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, focusing on key elements impacting patient well-being.

The foundation of effective asthma care rests on accessible primary care. In Harrisville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial factor. Data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) reveals a potential shortage of primary care physicians in many rural areas, and Harrisville's situation should be examined. A low physician-to-patient ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of asthma.

Evaluating the quality of care requires examining how asthma is managed within existing practices. This includes assessing the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Practices should be evaluated on their adherence to these guidelines, including the use of inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators, and written asthma action plans. The presence of certified asthma educators within practices is also critical. These educators provide patients with the education and skills necessary to manage their asthma effectively, reducing the frequency of exacerbations and improving quality of life.

Standout practices in Harrisville would demonstrate a proactive approach to asthma management. This might involve implementing electronic health record (EHR) systems that facilitate the tracking of asthma symptoms, medication adherence, and exacerbations. Practices that regularly review patient asthma control and adjust treatment plans accordingly would also be considered high-performing. Furthermore, practices that actively engage in patient education and provide resources for self-management would contribute to a higher Asthma Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another important aspect of asthma care. Telemedicine can expand access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas who may face transportation challenges. Telehealth consultations can facilitate medication management, symptom monitoring, and patient education. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their asthma care models would receive a higher rating. This could include the use of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters and spirometers, to track lung function and identify early signs of asthma exacerbations.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but their integration is crucial. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. Practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health services or referrals would demonstrate a comprehensive approach to patient care. This could include partnering with mental health professionals, offering counseling services, or providing educational materials on managing the psychological aspects of asthma.

To assess the Asthma Score, a comprehensive evaluation would consider several factors. The availability of primary care physicians, the adherence to evidence-based asthma guidelines, the presence of certified asthma educators, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources would all be weighed. The final score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care within the community.

To enhance the Asthma Score, several improvements could be implemented. Increasing the number of primary care physicians in the area would improve access to care. Practices could invest in EHR systems and implement standardized asthma protocols. Promoting the use of telemedicine would expand access to care for patients with limited mobility or transportation options. Finally, increasing awareness of the link between asthma and mental health, and ensuring access to mental health services, would significantly improve the overall Asthma Score.

The Harrisville Asthma Score would likely be impacted by its rural setting. Rural communities often face challenges in accessing healthcare, including a shortage of specialists and limited transportation options. This could lead to a lower Asthma Score compared to more urban areas with greater access to resources. However, proactive efforts by local healthcare providers, community organizations, and the local government can mitigate these challenges and improve the quality of asthma care.

Specific practices in Harrisville should be researched for their adherence to asthma guidelines. Examining the availability of asthma educators, the use of EHR systems, and the integration of telemedicine would provide valuable insights. The adoption of patient-centered care models, where patients are actively involved in their treatment plans, would be another key indicator of quality.

The Harrisville Asthma Score is not static; it can evolve. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation of asthma care practices are essential. Regular assessments of physician-to-patient ratios, the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, and the integration of new technologies can lead to continuous improvement. The ultimate goal is to provide the best possible care for individuals with asthma, allowing them to live full and active lives.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in Harrisville, and gain deeper insights into the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations and accessibility, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you analyze the data and identify areas where asthma care can be improved.