39114, Mendenhall, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39114, Mendenhall, Mississippi is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.85 percent of the residents in 39114 has some form of health insurance. 45.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.67 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39114 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,512 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39114. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,097 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 299 health care providers accessible to residents in 39114, Mendenhall, Mississippi.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors and Primary Care in Mendenhall, MS (ZIP Code 39114)**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within Mendenhall, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39114), requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of asthma management resources, and the integration of modern healthcare practices like telemedicine. This analysis will provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, evaluating the accessibility and effectiveness of care for individuals managing this chronic respiratory condition.

The foundation of good asthma care lies in accessible primary care. In Mendenhall, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A limited number of primary care physicians can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis, treatment initiation, and ongoing management of asthma symptoms. High patient volume can also strain physician resources, impacting the time available for comprehensive patient education and personalized care plans, essential components of effective asthma control.

Furthermore, the proximity of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, is crucial. While primary care physicians often manage asthma, complex cases or those requiring advanced interventions necessitate specialist consultation. The distance to specialists in nearby cities or towns can significantly impact the timeliness of care, potentially affecting asthma control and increasing the risk of exacerbations. Travel time adds a layer of complexity, especially for patients with limited mobility or transportation challenges.

Standout practices in Mendenhall, if any, would be those prioritizing patient education and proactive asthma management. This includes offering comprehensive asthma action plans, providing training on inhaler techniques, and educating patients about environmental triggers and avoidance strategies. Practices that actively monitor asthma control through regular follow-up appointments and symptom assessments demonstrate a commitment to patient well-being.

The adoption of telemedicine represents a significant opportunity to improve asthma care accessibility in Mendenhall. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. This is particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and improving adherence to treatment plans. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments or remote monitoring capabilities, are likely to demonstrate a higher "Asthma Score."

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of asthma management, but they play a vital role. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Practices that integrate mental health screening and provide access to counseling or support groups for asthma patients demonstrate a holistic approach to care. This integration can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and enhance overall well-being.

To assess the "Asthma Score," we consider several factors. First, the availability of primary care physicians and specialists, including their patient load and accessibility. Second, the presence of practices with a strong focus on patient education, providing comprehensive asthma action plans, and training on inhaler techniques. Third, the adoption of telemedicine and its impact on accessibility and patient adherence. Finally, the integration of mental health resources and support for asthma patients.

A high "Asthma Score" indicates a healthcare environment that is well-equipped to manage asthma effectively. This includes readily available primary care, access to specialists, proactive patient education, the use of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health support. Conversely, a low score suggests challenges in accessing care, limited resources, and a potential need for improvement in asthma management practices.

Evaluating the specific practices in Mendenhall requires a detailed review of their services, patient reviews, and adherence to asthma guidelines. This involves assessing the availability of appointments, the quality of patient education materials, and the integration of telemedicine and mental health services. A comprehensive analysis would involve contacting local practices, reviewing their websites, and examining publicly available data on healthcare quality indicators.

The availability of specialized asthma clinics or programs in Mendenhall would significantly enhance the "Asthma Score." These clinics often provide comprehensive asthma management services, including diagnostic testing, personalized treatment plans, and ongoing education and support. The presence of such resources would demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality asthma care within the community.

Environmental factors also play a role in asthma management. The prevalence of allergens, air quality, and exposure to environmental triggers can significantly impact asthma symptoms. Public health initiatives aimed at addressing these factors, such as air quality monitoring and allergen control programs, can contribute to improved asthma control within the community.

In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for Mendenhall requires a detailed evaluation of the healthcare landscape, considering physician availability, the quality of care, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. Practices that prioritize patient education, proactive management, and access to specialized services are likely to demonstrate a higher score. A comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare environment is essential for developing strategies to improve asthma care and support the well-being of individuals living with this chronic condition.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Mendenhall, including physician locations, specialist availability, and the location of healthcare facilities, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a powerful tool for analyzing healthcare data and identifying areas where resources are needed.