39116, Mize, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39116, Mize, Mississippi is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.08 percent of the residents in 39116 has some form of health insurance. 42.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.87 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39116 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 717 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39116. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 436 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 360 health care providers accessible to residents in 39116, Mize, Mississippi.

Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 39116 and Primary Care Availability in Mize

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 39116 and assessing primary care availability in the adjacent community of Mize requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will focus on asthma care, physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the accessibility and quality of care for individuals managing asthma in this specific geographic area.

The starting point is the identification of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists within 39116. This involves utilizing publicly available databases, insurance provider directories, and potentially contacting local hospitals and clinics. The focus is on physicians actively accepting new patients, especially those with a specialization or demonstrated expertise in asthma management. The number of physicians per capita is a crucial metric. A low physician-to-patient ratio can indicate limited access to care, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and a less personalized approach to treatment.

Assessing the quality of asthma care involves evaluating several factors. Does the practice offer comprehensive asthma action plans? Are they up-to-date with the latest guidelines from organizations like the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI)? Do they provide patient education materials and resources? A high-quality practice will actively engage patients in their care, empowering them to manage their condition effectively. Furthermore, the availability of on-site pulmonary function testing (PFT) and other diagnostic tools is a significant advantage, streamlining the diagnostic and monitoring process.

The presence of standout practices is also important. These are clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate exceptional commitment to asthma care. This could involve a dedicated asthma clinic, a physician with specialized training in asthma management, or a practice that consistently receives positive patient reviews. Identifying these practices requires a combination of research, including reviewing online patient testimonials and potentially contacting local healthcare organizations for recommendations.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of this analysis. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Evaluating telemedicine adoption involves determining which practices offer virtual visits, the platforms they utilize, and the types of services available via telemedicine. The availability of remote monitoring tools, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, would be a further advantage.

The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is often overlooked, but it is essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Assessing the availability of mental health services, such as on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, is a key component of this analysis. Practices that recognize the link between asthma and mental health and offer integrated care demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient well-being.

Primary care availability in Mize, a smaller community, presents a different set of challenges. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely to be lower than in 39116, potentially indicating a greater need for travel to access care. The analysis must determine the number of PCPs serving Mize residents, their specialties, and their acceptance of new patients. The distance to the nearest hospitals and specialists is another crucial factor, as this can impact access to emergency care and specialized asthma treatment.

The analysis should also examine the availability of transportation options for patients in Mize. Limited access to transportation can be a significant barrier to accessing healthcare, especially for individuals with chronic conditions like asthma. This includes assessing the availability of public transportation, ride-sharing services, and community-based transportation programs.

The assessment of asthma care quality in Mize must consider the resources available to the local PCPs. Do they have access to specialists for referrals? Are they able to offer comprehensive asthma action plans and patient education? The analysis should also investigate the availability of community resources, such as support groups and educational programs for asthma patients.

The role of local hospitals and clinics in both 39116 and Mize should not be overlooked. These institutions often provide essential services, including emergency care for asthma exacerbations and access to specialized asthma care. The analysis should evaluate the quality of care provided by these institutions, including their ability to manage severe asthma cases and their collaboration with primary care physicians.

Furthermore, the analysis must consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma care. Poverty, lack of access to health insurance, and environmental factors can all contribute to poor asthma outcomes. The analysis should identify any disparities in care and consider the potential impact of these factors on the health of asthma patients in both 39116 and Mize.

The final Asthma Score would be a composite rating reflecting the availability of physicians, the quality of care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the impact of socioeconomic factors. It would provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape for asthma patients in this specific geographic area. This information is critical for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers seeking to improve asthma care and outcomes.

For a visual representation of this data and a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping tools that can visually represent physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant data points. This can greatly enhance your understanding of the healthcare landscape and identify areas where resources are needed most.