The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39145, Pelahatchie, Mississippi is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.23 percent of the residents in 39145 has some form of health insurance. 40.62 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39145 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,244 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39145. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 961 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 956 health care providers accessible to residents in 39145, Pelahatchie, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39145, Pelahatchie, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 26 |
---|---|
People Score | 63 |
Provider Score | 25 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 39 |
39145 | Pelahatchie | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality, particularly regarding asthma management, requires a nuanced approach. This analysis focuses on doctors within ZIP Code 39145 (Pelahatchie, Mississippi) and the availability of primary care services, including the crucial aspect of asthma care. We'll delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight exemplary practices, explore telemedicine integration, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all vital components of a comprehensive asthma score assessment.
Pelahatchie, a relatively small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to care, and potentially poorer health outcomes, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. Determining the exact ratio requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the US Department of Health & Human Services or the Mississippi State Department of Health. This initial data point is fundamental to understanding the baseline level of access.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians within the ZIP code is essential. Are the existing physicians clustered in one area, or are they geographically dispersed, making access easier for residents across Pelahatchie? This spatial analysis is crucial. Furthermore, we need to consider the types of physicians available. Are there enough family medicine doctors, internal medicine specialists, and pediatricians to serve the diverse needs of the population, including those with asthma? The presence of board-certified allergists or pulmonologists, while not always essential for basic asthma management, significantly enhances the quality of specialized care available.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. Patient reviews, available through platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, offer valuable insights into patient experiences, including wait times, communication with physicians, and overall satisfaction. Practices that consistently receive positive feedback, particularly regarding asthma management, are strong contenders. Additionally, examining the practice's commitment to evidence-based asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), is vital. This includes assessing whether practices offer comprehensive asthma action plans, patient education materials, and regular follow-up appointments to monitor asthma control.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in the asthma score analysis. Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of peak flow meters, and online access to patient portals are demonstrating a commitment to patient-centered care. The availability of telemedicine can reduce the burden of travel, improve medication adherence, and facilitate more frequent monitoring, all of which are beneficial for asthma management.
The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, and these conditions can significantly impact asthma control. Therefore, assessing the availability of mental health resources within Pelahatchie is crucial. This includes the presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, who are either integrated into primary care practices or readily accessible through referrals. The availability of mental health support groups or educational programs specifically tailored to individuals with asthma is also a positive indicator.
To formulate a comprehensive asthma score, we would assign weighted values to each of these factors. Physician-to-patient ratio would receive a significant weight, reflecting its impact on access. The presence of board-certified specialists, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would also receive considerable weight, reflecting their contributions to quality of care. The final score would then reflect a composite assessment of the overall healthcare landscape for asthma management within ZIP Code 39145.
The analysis goes beyond just identifying the presence or absence of resources. It also assesses the quality and accessibility of those resources. For instance, the mere presence of a mental health professional isn't enough; we need to evaluate the wait times for appointments, the insurance coverage accepted, and the integration of mental health services with primary care. Similarly, telemedicine adoption is more meaningful if the practice offers a user-friendly platform and provides adequate technical support to patients.
The data for this analysis is gathered from a variety of sources. Publicly available data from government agencies provides information on physician-to-patient ratios and the distribution of healthcare providers. Online review platforms offer insights into patient experiences. Practice websites and phone calls provide information on services offered, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The data collection process is iterative, requiring continuous updates to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
The challenges in Pelahatchie, like many rural communities, likely involve limited resources and potential disparities in access. The asthma score analysis helps identify these challenges and provides a roadmap for improvement. This could include advocating for increased physician recruitment, promoting telemedicine adoption, and fostering collaboration between primary care practices and mental health providers.
Ultimately, the goal of the asthma score analysis is to empower patients and improve health outcomes. By providing a clear and comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape, we can help individuals make informed decisions about their care and advocate for improvements in the community.
For a visual representation of the data, including geographical distribution of physicians, access to resources, and potential areas for improvement, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow for interactive visualization of the data, providing a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape in Pelahatchie and beyond. Explore the possibilities; visit CartoChrome today.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like