The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39157, Ridgeland, Mississippi is 96 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.55 percent of the residents in 39157 has some form of health insurance. 23.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.98 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39157 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,458 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 19 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39157. An estimate of 20 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,674 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,928 health care providers accessible to residents in 39157, Ridgeland, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39157, Ridgeland, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 83 |
---|---|
People Score | 56 |
Provider Score | 96 |
Hospital Score | 23 |
Travel Score | 70 |
39157 | Ridgeland | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within Ridgeland, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39157), requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider physician availability, the quality of care delivered, and access to supporting resources. This analysis provides an 'Asthma Score' assessment, focusing on key factors impacting patient outcomes. The score is a conceptual framework; no actual numerical ranking is being assigned.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can create access barriers, potentially delaying diagnosis or treatment. While specific data on physician counts within 39157 is not readily available, analyzing county-level data (Madison County) provides a general context. We would need to assess the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists practicing within the ZIP code, alongside the population size. This requires accessing databases like the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile or similar resources. A low physician-to-patient ratio necessitates exploring alternative care models.
Primary care availability is crucial, as PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma management. Their ability to diagnose, initiate treatment, and provide ongoing monitoring significantly impacts patient outcomes. Assessing primary care availability involves not just physician numbers but also factors like appointment wait times, insurance acceptance, and clinic hours. Longer wait times or limited hours can create access barriers, particularly for individuals experiencing acute asthma exacerbations. The presence of after-hours care options is also a significant factor.
Identifying standout practices within 39157 requires evaluating several criteria. Patient reviews and testimonials are valuable indicators of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. We can look for patient feedback on factors like communication, empathy, and the effectiveness of treatment plans. We would also need to assess the adoption of evidence-based asthma management guidelines. Practices adhering to national guidelines, such as those from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), demonstrate a commitment to providing optimal care.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical element. Telemedicine offers several benefits for asthma patients, including remote monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication refills. This can be especially beneficial for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining which practices offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools (e.g., peak flow meter integration), and patient portals for communication and medication management. The integration of telemedicine can improve access to care and enhance patient self-management.
Mental health resources are frequently overlooked but are essential. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Access to mental health support, either within primary care practices or through referrals, is crucial. The Asthma Score should consider the availability of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the community. Practices that integrate mental health screening and support into their asthma care programs are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Furthermore, the availability of asthma education programs is a critical factor. Patient education empowers individuals to manage their condition effectively. Asthma education programs should cover topics such as medication use, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans. Practices offering such programs, either in-person or online, demonstrate a commitment to patient empowerment and self-management. The Asthma Score should reflect the presence and quality of these educational resources.
Medication access is another key consideration. Ensuring that patients have access to necessary medications, including both controller and rescue medications, is essential. This involves assessing the availability of pharmacies within the community and the affordability of medications. Practices that assist patients in navigating medication costs and insurance coverage demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive care. The Asthma Score should consider the ease of medication access for patients.
The Asthma Score for Ridgeland, 39157, is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. While this analysis provides a framework for assessment, a comprehensive evaluation requires detailed data collection and analysis. The availability of physicians, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the accessibility of medications all contribute to the overall score.
The score is not a single number but rather a reflection of the strengths and weaknesses of the asthma care landscape within the ZIP code. It is a guide for identifying areas for improvement and for highlighting practices that are excelling in asthma management. A higher score indicates a more favorable environment for asthma patients, with better access to care, higher quality treatment, and greater support for self-management.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Ridgeland and surrounding areas, including physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and potential access barriers, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can visualize the data points discussed in this analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like