The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39474, Prentiss, Mississippi is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.46 percent of the residents in 39474 has some form of health insurance. 49.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 45.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39474 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 976 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39474. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,308 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 439 health care providers accessible to residents in 39474, Prentiss, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39474, Prentiss, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 9 |
---|---|
People Score | 12 |
Provider Score | 25 |
Hospital Score | 20 |
Travel Score | 59 |
39474 | Prentiss | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP code 39474 and the broader context of primary care accessibility in Prentiss, Mississippi, requires a multifaceted approach. An “Asthma Score” isn't a standardized metric, so this analysis will use several key indicators to assess the quality and accessibility of care. This includes physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized asthma care, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all of which significantly influence patient outcomes.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. In a rural area like Prentiss, the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts access to asthma management. A lower ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and less frequent follow-up care. This is particularly problematic for a chronic condition like asthma, which requires consistent monitoring and adjustments to treatment plans. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Mississippi State Department of Health would be crucial to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 39474 and the surrounding county. Publicly available information might not provide granular detail, necessitating the use of data analytics and potentially, collaboration with healthcare professionals in the area.
Beyond the raw numbers, the type of primary care available is important. Are there family medicine practices, internal medicine specialists, or pediatricians? Each offers a different level of expertise and focus. Asthma management, especially for children and the elderly, often benefits from specialized knowledge. The presence of board-certified allergists or pulmonologists within a reasonable distance would significantly improve the Asthma Score. Identifying practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, offer peak flow meter training, and have protocols for managing asthma exacerbations would further elevate the score.
Telemedicine adoption represents another crucial factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, particularly in rural settings, providing access to specialists and facilitating regular check-ins. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online educational resources would score higher. The availability of secure, HIPAA-compliant platforms for these services is essential. Investigating the adoption rate of telemedicine within primary care practices in 39474 and the surrounding areas would be key to understanding the current state of care delivery. This would involve researching practice websites, contacting clinics, and reviewing insurance coverage policies for telemedicine services.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, but critical, component of asthma management. Asthma, being a chronic condition, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the community or through referral networks is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screenings and offer referrals to mental health services would receive a higher score. Identifying partnerships between primary care practices and mental health providers would be a positive indicator.
Evaluating standout practices requires a deeper dive into individual clinic operations. Practices with dedicated asthma educators, well-defined asthma action plans, and a commitment to patient education would be considered exemplary. Reviewing patient testimonials, if available, can provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, track patient outcomes, and strive to improve asthma control rates would also be considered leaders in the field.
The analysis of primary care availability in Prentiss should consider the broader context of the local healthcare system. The presence of a hospital, urgent care centers, and other healthcare facilities impacts access to care. The availability of transportation options for patients, especially those with limited mobility or resources, is another critical factor. The presence of community health centers or other safety-net providers can significantly improve access to care for underserved populations.
To create a comprehensive Asthma Score, these factors must be weighted and combined. Physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialists, and telemedicine adoption should carry significant weight. The availability of mental health resources and the quality of care within individual practices should also be factored in. The final score would be a composite measure reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care within the specified geographic area.
This analysis would involve a combination of data collection, research, and expert consultation. Publicly available data sources, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Mississippi State Department of Health, would provide valuable information. Direct contact with healthcare providers in the area would be necessary to gather more specific information about their practices and services.
The final "Asthma Score" would be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It could be used to identify areas for improvement, inform healthcare decisions, and advocate for better resources. It would also provide a baseline for tracking progress over time.
For a visual representation of this data and a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can help visualize physician density, access to specialists, and the availability of telemedicine services, offering a powerful tool for analyzing and improving asthma care in Prentiss and surrounding areas.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like