39480, Soso, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39480, Soso, Mississippi is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.61 percent of the residents in 39480 has some form of health insurance. 22.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.30 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39480 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 722 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39480. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 438 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,746 health care providers accessible to residents in 39480, Soso, Mississippi.

The analysis below assesses asthma care quality and primary care access in Soso, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39480), focusing on physician availability, resource utilization, and the overall patient experience. This evaluation is not a definitive ranking but a comprehensive overview to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement within the local healthcare landscape.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of accessibility. In Soso, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts asthma management. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and challenges in establishing ongoing care plans. Accurate data on the exact ratio requires accessing specific local healthcare provider databases, which is beyond the scope of this general analysis. However, we can infer that Soso, being a rural community, may face challenges in attracting and retaining physicians, potentially resulting in a less favorable ratio compared to more urban areas. This scarcity can disproportionately affect asthma patients, who require regular check-ups and timely interventions.

Standout practices within the community are those that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. This includes practices that offer specialized asthma education, peak flow meter training, and personalized asthma action plans. These plans are essential for empowering patients to manage their condition effectively. Furthermore, practices that actively monitor patients' asthma control through regular assessments and medication adjustments are likely to achieve better outcomes. The presence of certified asthma educators within a practice is a significant asset, as they can provide individualized support and guidance to patients and their families. Identifying these standout practices necessitates in-depth research, including patient testimonials, reviews, and direct engagement with local healthcare providers.

Telemedicine adoption presents a significant opportunity to improve asthma care access, particularly in rural areas. Telehealth can facilitate virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. This can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, especially for patients with well-controlled asthma. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms can offer greater convenience and flexibility to patients, particularly those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Evaluating telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointment options, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the integration of telehealth services into the overall asthma care workflow.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they play a crucial role in overall well-being. Asthma can be a chronic condition that leads to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care programs are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This may involve offering on-site counseling services, referring patients to mental health specialists, or providing educational materials on stress management techniques. Assessing the availability of mental health resources requires understanding the collaborative relationships between primary care practices and mental health providers in the community.

The overall patient experience is a key determinant of asthma care quality. This includes factors such as appointment scheduling, wait times, communication with healthcare providers, and the clarity of instructions. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, actively listen to patient concerns, and provide clear and understandable information are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. Gathering patient feedback through surveys, focus groups, or online reviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and identify areas for improvement.

In conclusion, assessing asthma care in Soso requires a multifaceted approach. It involves analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, examining the availability of mental health resources, and understanding the overall patient experience. Addressing the challenges in these areas can significantly improve asthma management and the overall health of the community.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in Soso and gain a deeper understanding of physician locations, access to primary care, and potential areas for improvement, consider exploring the CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of the data discussed, allowing for a more comprehensive and insightful analysis.