The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39776, Woodland, Mississippi is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.24 percent of the residents in 39776 has some form of health insurance. 42.07 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.43 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39776 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 139 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39776. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 152 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 57 health care providers accessible to residents in 39776, Woodland, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39776, Woodland, Mississippi
Asthma Score | 16 |
---|---|
People Score | 42 |
Provider Score | 8 |
Hospital Score | 59 |
Travel Score | 28 |
39776 | Woodland | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 39776 and Primary Care in Woodland**
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 39776, encompassing the Woodland area, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on asthma care, primary care accessibility, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, offering insights for both residents and healthcare providers.
The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Woodland, evaluating primary care accessibility involves understanding the number of PCPs actively practicing within the designated area and the patient population they serve. A high physician-to-patient ratio can indicate limited access, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses, longer wait times for appointments, and reduced continuity of care, all of which can negatively impact asthma management. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests better access to preventative care, routine check-ups, and prompt treatment of asthma exacerbations.
Data from reliable sources, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards, are crucial for determining the physician-to-patient ratio. This data, however, must be cross-referenced with local healthcare directories and patient reviews to account for factors like physician specialization, practice size, and patient load. Further, the distribution of PCPs within Woodland is important. Are they concentrated in certain areas, creating healthcare deserts for some residents? This spatial analysis is critical for a complete picture.
Evaluating asthma care specifically requires examining the expertise of PCPs and specialists within the area. Are there board-certified pulmonologists or allergists available? The presence of these specialists is essential for complex asthma cases and for the provision of advanced diagnostic and treatment options. Furthermore, the level of asthma education provided by primary care practices should be assessed. Do they offer patient education on asthma triggers, medication management, and self-management techniques? These educational resources are vital for empowering patients to take control of their condition.
Identifying "standout practices" necessitates examining their performance metrics. This includes patient satisfaction scores, measured through surveys and online reviews. Practices with high patient satisfaction often demonstrate a commitment to providing quality care and building strong patient-physician relationships. Another key metric is the rate of asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Lower rates suggest effective asthma management and patient adherence to treatment plans. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), are likely to provide evidence-based care.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Woodland. The ability to access healthcare services remotely can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining the number of practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and online patient portals. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for asthma patients, allowing for remote monitoring of lung function, medication adjustments, and education on asthma management.
The integration of mental health resources into primary care is crucial for comprehensive asthma management. Asthma is often associated with anxiety and depression, and these conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and reduce patient adherence to treatment plans. Assessing the availability of mental health services involves determining whether primary care practices offer on-site counseling, referrals to mental health specialists, or integrated behavioral health programs. Practices that prioritize mental health support are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
In conclusion, a thorough asthma score analysis for Woodland requires a detailed evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, specialist availability, the quality of primary care practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis should incorporate data from various sources, including government agencies, healthcare directories, patient reviews, and practice performance metrics. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment that identifies strengths and weaknesses in the local healthcare system and informs strategies for improving asthma care and primary care accessibility.
This analysis is intended to provide a general overview. For a deeper understanding of the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, physician availability, and other relevant factors, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Woodland, allowing for a more nuanced and data-driven assessment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like