The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27020, Hamptonville, North Carolina is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 77.88 percent of the residents in 27020 has some form of health insurance. 36.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27020 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,749 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27020. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,043 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 327 health care providers accessible to residents in 27020, Hamptonville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27020, Hamptonville, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 26 |
Provider Score | 44 |
Hospital Score | 21 |
Travel Score | 41 |
27020 | Hamptonville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below focuses on assessing the “Asthma Score” for physicians in ZIP Code 27020, Hamptonville, North Carolina, and the availability of primary care resources. This score considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The aim is to provide a nuanced understanding of the accessibility and quality of care for asthma patients within this specific geographic area.
The foundation of a good asthma score begins with the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Hamptonville, being a relatively rural area, likely experiences challenges in physician distribution. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can significantly impact asthma care, as PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for diagnosis, management, and referrals to specialists. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to improved access and reduced wait times, crucial for patients experiencing asthma exacerbations. The score will, therefore, heavily weigh the density of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code.
Furthermore, the analysis considers the characteristics of the medical practices themselves. Standout practices will be those that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. This includes having dedicated asthma educators, offering pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site, and employing evidence-based treatment protocols. Practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those focused on asthma control, will also receive higher scores. The presence of these elements indicates a proactive approach to managing asthma and improving patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the asthma score. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, including secure video conferencing and remote monitoring capabilities, will be recognized for their forward-thinking approach. This element is particularly relevant in the context of asthma, where regular monitoring and adjustments to treatment plans are often necessary.
The integration of mental health resources into primary care is also a key factor in the asthma score. Asthma, like many chronic illnesses, can have a significant impact on mental well-being. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients. Practices that recognize this and offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals will be viewed more favorably. This holistic approach to care demonstrates a commitment to addressing the broader needs of asthma patients.
To assess the physician-to-patient ratios, the analysis will utilize publicly available data from sources such as the North Carolina Medical Board and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This data will be cross-referenced with population estimates for ZIP Code 27020 to calculate the ratio. This data will provide a baseline understanding of the accessibility of primary care.
Identifying standout practices requires a multi-faceted approach. The analysis will examine online reviews, patient testimonials, and practice websites to gather information about the services offered, the expertise of the physicians, and the overall patient experience. Additionally, the analysis will consider the practice's participation in quality improvement programs and its adherence to evidence-based guidelines for asthma management.
The adoption of telemedicine will be assessed by examining practice websites and through direct inquiries to the practices. This will determine the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and other telehealth services. The analysis will also consider the ease of use and accessibility of these technologies for patients.
The integration of mental health resources will be evaluated by examining practice websites, reviewing patient testimonials, and through direct inquiries. The analysis will assess whether practices offer on-site mental health services, have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, and actively screen patients for mental health concerns.
The final asthma score will be a composite score, reflecting the weighted average of these factors. The weighting will be based on the relative importance of each factor in determining the quality and accessibility of asthma care. Physician-to-patient ratios will be given a significant weight, reflecting their fundamental impact on access to care. The presence of asthma-specific services, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources will also be given substantial weight, reflecting their importance in providing comprehensive care.
The analysis will not produce a simple numerical score for each physician. Instead, it will provide a narrative assessment, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care landscape in ZIP Code 27020. This narrative approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in providing asthma care in this specific geographic area.
The analysis is designed to be a dynamic document. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies and treatment approaches emerging regularly. The asthma score will be updated periodically to reflect these changes and to ensure that it remains a relevant and useful resource for patients and healthcare providers.
The information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Patients should always consult with their healthcare providers for diagnosis and treatment of asthma. The analysis is not intended to endorse or recommend any specific physician or practice.
For a comprehensive, visual representation of the primary care landscape in Hamptonville, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and telemedicine availability, explore the power of geographic data visualization. Discover how CartoChrome maps can transform complex data into actionable insights. Visit CartoChrome today to explore the possibilities.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like