27205, Asheboro, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27205, Asheboro, North Carolina is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.33 percent of the residents in 27205 has some form of health insurance. 40.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.79 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27205 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 7,829 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27205. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,827 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,838 health care providers accessible to residents in 27205, Asheboro, North Carolina.

The analysis of asthma care within ZIP code 27205, Asheboro, North Carolina, necessitates a multi-faceted approach, evaluating both the quality of physician services and the accessibility of primary care. This assessment will culminate in an ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, reflecting the overall health of the asthma care ecosystem in this specific geographic area. The objective is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to asthma patients and identify potential areas for improvement.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and ultimately, poorer asthma control. The specific physician-to-patient ratio in 27205 for primary care physicians and, critically, pulmonologists and allergists, needs to be ascertained. Public health data from sources like the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Census Bureau can be used to determine this. A high ratio, conversely, suggests a potentially more favorable environment for patients, with greater ease of access to specialized care.

Assessing primary care availability involves more than just the raw physician-to-patient ratio. It's crucial to examine the distribution of primary care practices within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas. Are practices clustered in certain areas, leaving others underserved? The proximity of these practices to residential areas, public transportation routes, and pharmacies are also important considerations. This includes the availability of evening and weekend appointments, which are crucial for working families and individuals who may find it difficult to access care during standard business hours.

Standout practices within 27205 warrant specific recognition. These practices may be identified through patient reviews, peer recommendations, and the quality of care indicators. Factors to consider include the expertise of the physicians in asthma management, the availability of specialized equipment (e.g., pulmonary function testing), the provision of patient education and self-management training, and the implementation of evidence-based asthma guidelines. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate positive patient outcomes should be highlighted.

Telemedicine adoption plays a significant role in modern asthma care. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide education via telehealth platforms can improve access to care, especially for patients who live in rural areas, have mobility limitations, or face transportation challenges. The extent to which practices in 27205 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is a key factor in the Asthma Score analysis.

The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is increasingly recognized as essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. This includes screening for mental health conditions, providing brief interventions, and coordinating care with mental health specialists. The availability of these resources within the primary care setting can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and overall asthma control.

The Asthma Score, therefore, will be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed. It will be based on a weighted scoring system, with each factor contributing to the overall score. The weighting will reflect the relative importance of each factor in influencing asthma outcomes. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of specialized care may carry a higher weight than the availability of evening appointments. The score will be presented in a way that is easily understandable, providing a clear picture of the asthma care landscape in 27205.

A comprehensive analysis will also consider the demographics of the population served by these practices. Asthma disproportionately affects certain populations, including children, the elderly, and those with lower socioeconomic status. An assessment of whether practices are addressing the unique needs of these populations is crucial. This includes providing culturally competent care, offering translation services, and addressing social determinants of health that may impact asthma control.

The analysis will also examine the availability of asthma education and self-management programs. These programs empower patients to take an active role in their care, improving their ability to manage their symptoms and reduce the risk of exacerbations. The Asthma Score will reflect the extent to which practices offer these programs, either directly or through referrals to community resources.

The final Asthma Score will provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness in the asthma care system, and to inform efforts to improve access to care and patient outcomes. The analysis will highlight best practices and identify opportunities for collaboration and innovation.

The analysis will also consider the impact of environmental factors on asthma prevalence and control. This includes air quality, pollen counts, and the presence of allergens in the home. The Asthma Score will reflect the extent to which practices are educating patients about these environmental triggers and providing guidance on how to minimize exposure.

In conclusion, the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis for doctors in ZIP code 27205 and primary care availability in Asheboro will offer a comprehensive assessment of the asthma care landscape. It will provide a valuable resource for patients, providers, and policymakers seeking to improve asthma management and patient outcomes.

To gain a visual understanding of the data and the geographical distribution of resources, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide valuable insights into the location of healthcare providers, the distribution of asthma cases, and other relevant factors.