The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27283, Julian, North Carolina is 62 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.32 percent of the residents in 27283 has some form of health insurance. 27.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27283 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 770 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27283. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 539 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,785 health care providers accessible to residents in 27283, Julian, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27283, Julian, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 80 |
---|---|
People Score | 74 |
Provider Score | 62 |
Hospital Score | 50 |
Travel Score | 53 |
27283 | Julian | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, disproportionately impacts certain communities. Evaluating access to quality asthma care is crucial, especially when considering specific geographic areas like Julian, North Carolina, within ZIP code 27283. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources. The assessment will consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all factors impacting asthma management.
The cornerstone of effective asthma management is consistent primary care. In Julian (27283), understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. Publicly available data from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) and the US Census Bureau can be used to estimate this ratio. This involves determining the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code and comparing it to the total population. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, could indicate potential access challenges, particularly for patients needing routine check-ups, medication refills, and urgent care for asthma exacerbations. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is critical. Identifying "standout practices" involves looking beyond the physician-to-patient ratio. This includes evaluating factors such as the practice’s commitment to asthma management guidelines, the availability of specialized asthma education for patients, and the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate coordinated care. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, consistently achieve positive patient outcomes, and offer comprehensive asthma action plans would score higher in the "Asthma Score" analysis. Reviews from patients and community health organizations also provide valuable insights into a practice's reputation and service quality.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas like Julian. Its adoption can improve access to care, particularly for patients with chronic conditions such as asthma. Practices that offer telemedicine consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and virtual asthma education programs would receive higher scores. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with their PCPs or specialists remotely, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. The ability to access care from the comfort of one's home is particularly beneficial during times of environmental triggers or in the event of a flare-up.
Asthma is often associated with mental health challenges. Anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms and reduce adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an essential component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or through referrals to external mental health providers, would score higher. This integration ensures that patients receive holistic care, addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of their condition. Coordination between PCPs and mental health professionals is crucial for effective asthma management.
The “Asthma Score” would also consider the availability of asthma-specific resources within the community. This includes access to asthma education programs, support groups, and community health initiatives. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and partner with local organizations to raise awareness about asthma and provide education would receive higher scores. The presence of these resources demonstrates a commitment to improving the overall health and well-being of individuals with asthma in the community.
To calculate the "Asthma Score," a weighted scoring system can be employed. Each factor, such as physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability, would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The practice would then be assessed based on its performance on each factor. The scores for each factor would be multiplied by their respective weights, and the results would be summed to arrive at the final "Asthma Score." This score provides a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in the region.
The "Asthma Score" analysis, when applied to Julian (27283), provides a valuable framework for evaluating the current state of asthma care. It helps identify areas of strength and weakness, enabling healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members to work collaboratively to improve access to quality care. The analysis can also be used to inform decision-making, such as the allocation of resources and the development of targeted interventions to address specific needs within the community.
Ultimately, the goal is to improve the lives of individuals with asthma by ensuring they have access to the care and resources they need to manage their condition effectively. The "Asthma Score" analysis is a tool that can help achieve this goal by providing a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape and identifying opportunities for improvement. This analysis can be updated periodically to track progress and identify emerging trends in asthma care.
To further explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including primary care physicians, specialists, and mental health providers, and to visualize the "Asthma Score" data spatially, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow for a visual representation of the data, making it easier to identify areas with limited access to care and to target interventions more effectively. They can also be used to analyze the relationship between asthma prevalence and environmental factors, such as air quality and pollen counts, which can help inform asthma management strategies.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like