Asthma Score

27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.23 percent of the residents in 27314 has some form of health insurance. 24.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27314 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 150 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27314. An estimate of 11 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 86 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,057 health care providers accessible to residents in 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina

Asthma Score 56
People Score 82
Provider Score 17
Hospital Score 55
Travel Score 47

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

27314 Prospect Hill North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina

## Asthma Score Analysis: Prospect Hill, NC (ZIP Code 27314)

Prospect Hill, North Carolina, a rural community nestled within ZIP Code 27314, presents a unique landscape for assessing asthma care and primary care availability. An "Asthma Score" analysis, designed to evaluate the quality and accessibility of care for asthma sufferers, requires a multifaceted approach, considering factors beyond simple physician counts. This analysis will delve into the specifics of this area, examining physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and assessing the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components in comprehensive asthma management.

The cornerstone of any healthcare assessment is the physician-to-patient ratio. In a rural area like Prospect Hill, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is paramount. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can significantly hinder access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of chronic conditions like asthma. Publicly available data, such as that provided by the US Census Bureau and the North Carolina Medical Board, can be used to estimate the population within the 27314 ZIP code. Comparing this population figure with the number of actively practicing PCPs within the area provides a baseline understanding of access. It's crucial to note that this ratio alone doesn't paint the complete picture. Factors such as the age and health status of the population, the presence of specialists, and the proximity to larger medical centers all influence the actual accessibility of care.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is a critical element of the Asthma Score. Identifying standout practices requires an examination of their commitment to asthma management best practices. This includes the use of evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment, patient education programs, and proactive strategies for preventing asthma exacerbations. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to these areas often achieve better patient outcomes. Publicly available information, such as patient satisfaction surveys and practice accreditation data, can provide insights into the quality of care offered. Furthermore, actively seeking feedback from asthma patients in the community through surveys or focus groups can offer valuable, firsthand perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of local healthcare providers.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor in the Asthma Score. In rural areas, telemedicine can bridge the geographical gap, allowing patients to access specialist consultations and follow-up appointments without the need for lengthy travel. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience and reduce the burden of managing chronic conditions. The availability of telehealth services, including virtual visits, remote monitoring, and digital asthma education programs, significantly enhances the accessibility of asthma care. Evaluating the adoption of telemedicine requires identifying which practices offer these services, the types of services available, and the ease with which patients can access them.

Asthma is often linked to mental health issues. Chronic conditions can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a crucial component of comprehensive asthma care. The Asthma Score should assess the accessibility of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. This includes evaluating the number of mental health providers in the area, the acceptance of insurance, and the availability of integrated care models where mental health services are offered in conjunction with primary care. The presence of support groups and educational resources for both patients and their families further enhances the overall quality of care.

The Asthma Score analysis also considers the availability of asthma-specific resources. This includes access to certified asthma educators, respiratory therapists, and specialized asthma clinics. Practices that have these resources in place are better equipped to provide comprehensive asthma management, including patient education, medication management, and the development of personalized asthma action plans. The presence of these specialized resources is a strong indicator of a practice's commitment to providing high-quality asthma care.

Analyzing the availability of primary care in Prospect Hill also requires an assessment of the types of practices available. Are there solo practitioners, group practices, or affiliations with larger healthcare systems? The structure of a practice can influence the availability of services, the level of specialization, and the ability to offer comprehensive care. Practices affiliated with larger healthcare systems may have access to more resources, including specialists, technology, and administrative support. However, smaller practices may offer a more personalized approach to patient care.

Furthermore, the Asthma Score analysis must consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact asthma outcomes. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and substandard housing conditions can all exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder effective management. The analysis should assess the prevalence of these factors within the community and consider how healthcare providers are addressing these social determinants of health. This could include partnerships with community organizations, outreach programs, and initiatives to improve access to resources.

The Asthma Score, therefore, is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the current state of asthma care and primary care availability in Prospect Hill. It requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation to identify areas for improvement and to ensure that patients have access to the best possible care. The goal is to create a healthier community where individuals with asthma can thrive.

In conclusion, understanding the nuances of asthma care within ZIP Code 27314 requires a comprehensive analysis that extends beyond simple physician counts. The assessment must encompass physician-to-patient ratios, the identification of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the consideration of socioeconomic factors. This multifaceted approach provides a more accurate and insightful understanding of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Prospect Hill.

To visualize and analyze the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, patient demographics, and environmental factors that may impact asthma, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the data, facilitating a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Prospect Hill and enabling more informed decision-making.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina

You may also like

27291, Leasburg, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 11.04 Miles

Total Population:

27302, Mebane, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 13.44 Miles

Total Population:

27278, Hillsborough, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 15.19 Miles

Total Population:

27343, Semora, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 16.48 Miles

Total Population:

27305, Milton, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 17.38 Miles

Total Population:

27315, Providence, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 19.16 Miles

Total Population:

27311, Pelham, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 21.57 Miles

Total Population:

27340, Saxapahaw, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 23.69 Miles

Total Population:

27326, Ruffin, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 27314: 24.90 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 27314, Prospect Hill, North Carolina