The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27350, Sophia, North Carolina is 69 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.51 percent of the residents in 27350 has some form of health insurance. 28.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27350 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,574 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27350. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 968 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 975 health care providers accessible to residents in 27350, Sophia, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27350, Sophia, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 50 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 69 |
Hospital Score | 20 |
Travel Score | 60 |
27350 | Sophia | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: ZIP Code 27350 & Sophia, NC
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP code 27350, encompassing the town of Sophia, North Carolina, with a specific focus on primary care access, physician-to-patient ratios, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions. The goal is to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, evaluating the landscape of care for individuals managing this chronic respiratory condition.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and competent primary care. In Sophia, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical factor. While precise physician-to-patient ratios fluctuate, a scarcity of PCPs can significantly hinder access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management for asthma sufferers. The impact is compounded by factors such as insurance coverage, transportation limitations, and the general health of the community.
The "Asthma Score" for Sophia must consider the geographical distribution of primary care practices. Are these practices clustered in certain areas, potentially creating access disparities for residents in more rural or underserved pockets of the town? Analyzing the proximity of practices to residential areas, along with the availability of public transportation, is crucial in evaluating the overall accessibility of care.
Within the primary care landscape, the quality of asthma management protocols is paramount. Does each practice have standardized protocols for asthma diagnosis, treatment, and patient education? Are physicians and support staff adequately trained in asthma management, including the use of inhalers, peak flow meters, and recognizing the signs of an asthma exacerbation? The presence of dedicated asthma educators or respiratory therapists within a practice would significantly elevate its "Asthma Score."
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to improve asthma care in Sophia. Remote consultations, medication management, and patient monitoring can significantly enhance access, especially for patients with mobility issues or those residing in geographically isolated areas. The "Asthma Score" should assess the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine platforms, including the ease of use, the availability of technical support for patients, and the integration of telemedicine into their existing workflows.
Beyond primary care, the availability of specialist care, such as pulmonologists and allergists, is a crucial component of the "Asthma Score." While not all asthma patients require specialist care, access to these specialists is vital for individuals with severe or uncontrolled asthma. The analysis must consider the distance to specialist practices, the waiting times for appointments, and the availability of after-hours or emergency care options.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to asthma management. The chronic nature of asthma, coupled with the potential for exacerbations and hospitalizations, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The "Asthma Score" must assess the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. The integration of mental health screening and treatment into primary care practices would significantly improve the overall quality of care.
Another critical aspect of the "Asthma Score" is patient education. Does the practice provide comprehensive education on asthma triggers, medication use, and self-management techniques? Are patients equipped with written action plans that outline steps to take during an asthma exacerbation? The availability of educational materials in multiple languages would further enhance the "Asthma Score," reflecting a commitment to serving a diverse population.
The integration of technology into asthma management can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, monitor medication adherence, and facilitate communication between patients and providers are likely to achieve a higher "Asthma Score." The use of mobile apps for asthma tracking and symptom monitoring can also empower patients to take a more active role in their care.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP code 27350 is essential. These practices may demonstrate exceptional asthma management protocols, innovative use of technology, or a strong commitment to patient education and support. The "Asthma Score" analysis should highlight these practices, providing examples of best practices that can be replicated by other providers in the area. These practices might be distinguished by their patient satisfaction scores, their adherence to national asthma guidelines, or their proactive approach to preventing asthma exacerbations.
The analysis must also consider the role of community resources in supporting asthma patients. Are there local support groups or organizations that provide education, advocacy, and peer support? Are there programs that offer financial assistance for asthma medications or equipment? The availability of these resources can significantly improve the quality of life for asthma patients and contribute to a higher "Asthma Score" for the community.
Finally, the "Asthma Score" should be dynamic, reflecting the ever-changing landscape of healthcare. Regular updates and reassessments are necessary to ensure that the analysis remains relevant and accurate. The analysis should also incorporate feedback from patients and healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement and to track progress over time. This iterative approach is essential for continuously improving asthma care in Sophia and the surrounding areas.
To visualize and analyze the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data, consider utilizing the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape, allowing for a deeper understanding of access, disparities, and opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like