The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27576, Selma, North Carolina is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.76 percent of the residents in 27576 has some form of health insurance. 43.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27576 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,252 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27576. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,920 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,211 health care providers accessible to residents in 27576, Selma, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27576, Selma, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 7 |
---|---|
People Score | 7 |
Provider Score | 41 |
Hospital Score | 21 |
Travel Score | 41 |
27576 | Selma | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management in Selma, North Carolina (ZIP Code 27576) presents a complex landscape. Analyzing the quality of care requires a multi-faceted approach, considering physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of supportive services. This analysis provides an ‘Asthma Score’ assessment, focusing on key indicators that contribute to effective asthma management for residents.
Physician-to-patient ratios in Selma are a crucial starting point. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts access to initial asthma diagnoses, ongoing management, and preventative care. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can strain resources, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced opportunities for comprehensive asthma education and monitoring. The specific ratio within 27576 requires investigation, but if the ratio is unfavorable, it suggests a need for strategies to improve access. This might include incentivizing physician recruitment or expanding telehealth options.
Primary care availability in Selma is a key factor. The presence of multiple primary care practices, both independent and affiliated with larger healthcare systems, is a positive indicator. The number of practices alone doesn’t tell the whole story. The types of services offered within these practices are also important. Do they offer in-house pulmonary function testing? Do they have dedicated asthma educators? These factors contribute significantly to the overall asthma score. The presence of specialized asthma clinics, even if located outside of Selma, but easily accessible, would also enhance the score.
Standout practices within Selma would demonstrate excellence in asthma management. These practices would likely have a proactive approach to asthma care. This includes implementing evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). They would prioritize patient education, providing clear instructions on medication use, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans. They would also actively monitor patients’ asthma control, using objective measures like peak flow meters and symptom questionnaires. Furthermore, standout practices would collaborate effectively with specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists, when necessary.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in asthma management. Telehealth can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in rural areas. Practices that utilize telemedicine for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and asthma education would receive a higher asthma score. The ability to remotely monitor patients’ symptoms and adjust treatment plans accordingly can also improve asthma control and reduce the need for emergency room visits. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as connected peak flow meters, would further enhance the value of telemedicine integration.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked component of asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health screening and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, would be positively evaluated. This integration recognizes the holistic nature of asthma management and supports patients’ overall well-being. The availability of support groups or educational programs focused on coping with asthma would also contribute to a higher score.
Specific details regarding individual practices within 27576 would be needed to provide a precise asthma score. However, the following elements would contribute to a higher score: a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of multiple primary care practices offering comprehensive asthma services, adoption of telemedicine for asthma management, and integration of mental health resources.
To further refine this analysis, data collection is essential. This includes gathering information on the number of PCPs in the area, the services offered by each practice, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback from asthma support groups could also provide valuable insights.
Assessing the effectiveness of asthma management requires looking beyond the individual practices. The broader community environment is also important. This includes the availability of clean air initiatives, public health campaigns promoting asthma awareness, and access to affordable medications. The collaboration between healthcare providers, schools, and community organizations can significantly impact the overall asthma score.
The assessment of asthma management also needs to consider the socioeconomic factors that impact asthma control. These factors include poverty, housing conditions, and access to transportation. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for achieving equitable asthma outcomes.
The asthma score is not a static measure. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, the implementation of new treatment guidelines, and advancements in technology. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential for ensuring that residents of Selma, NC, receive the best possible asthma care.
Finally, visualizing the data can be a powerful tool for understanding the asthma landscape in Selma. CartoChrome maps can be used to create interactive maps that display physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources. This visualization can help identify areas where asthma care is strong and areas where improvements are needed.
Ready to visualize the asthma care landscape in Selma? Explore the possibilities with CartoChrome maps. Click here to learn more and start mapping the data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like