27871, Robersonville, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27871, Robersonville, North Carolina is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 84.72 percent of the residents in 27871 has some form of health insurance. 52.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.39 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27871 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 544 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 110 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27871. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 998 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,356 health care providers accessible to residents in 27871, Robersonville, North Carolina.

## Asthma Score Analysis: 27871 & Robersonville Primary Care

Analyzing the asthma care landscape in ZIP code 27871, which encompasses Robersonville, North Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to evaluate the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), their expertise in asthma management, the resources available to patients, and the overall healthcare infrastructure. This analysis aims to provide an “Asthma Score” assessment, considering key factors impacting asthma sufferers in this specific geographic area.

A critical element in assessing asthma care is the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise, up-to-the-minute figures fluctuate, understanding the general trend is vital. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can lead to appointment delays, reduced time spent per patient, and a potential for fragmented care. Conversely, a higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better accessibility. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau, when combined, can provide a baseline. Further research, utilizing resources like the Area Health Resources Files, can offer a more granular understanding of physician distribution within the ZIP code and surrounding areas. This data will inform our assessment of access to care.

The quality of asthma management within primary care practices is another crucial factor. This includes the physician’s familiarity with current asthma guidelines, their use of spirometry for diagnosis and monitoring, and their ability to effectively prescribe and manage asthma medications. Assessing this involves looking at the continuing medical education (CME) participation of local physicians, focusing on asthma-related topics. Furthermore, reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, when available, can provide insights into the perceived quality of care. Patient testimonials and online reviews, while potentially biased, can offer anecdotal evidence of both positive and negative experiences, which can inform our overall score.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma care through specific programs, specialized staff (e.g., asthma educators), and proactive patient management deserve recognition. These practices often implement patient education initiatives, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitor patient outcomes. A practice that actively utilizes electronic health records (EHRs) to track asthma control and medication adherence would score higher. Practices that collaborate with pulmonologists and other specialists to provide coordinated care are also considered favorably. This requires research into local practices, reviewing their websites, and potentially contacting them directly to gather information.

The adoption of telemedicine is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients who live far from their physicians or have mobility issues. Assessing the telemedicine capabilities of local practices, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, medication refills), the technology used, and the patient experience, is essential. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering convenient and accessible care options, would receive a higher score. This requires research into the telehealth offerings of local practices and patient feedback on their experiences.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are critical for asthma patients. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Evaluating the availability of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the local healthcare ecosystem is crucial. Assessing whether primary care practices screen for mental health issues and have established referral pathways to mental health professionals is also important. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care plans would score higher. This involves research into the availability of mental health resources in the area and the integration of mental health services within primary care practices.

Specific to Robersonville, the availability of primary care is a key determinant of the Asthma Score. The town's relatively small size and rural location may present challenges in accessing care. The concentration of physicians, specialists, and supporting healthcare staff within the immediate vicinity needs careful consideration. The presence of a hospital or clinic in Robersonville, and its capacity to manage asthma exacerbations, will significantly impact the overall score. Assessing transportation options for patients to access care, especially for those without personal vehicles, is also important.

The overall “Asthma Score” for the area will be a composite of these factors. It will be a qualitative assessment, not a numerical score, as data availability may be limited. The score will reflect the perceived accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of asthma care in ZIP code 27871. The score will also reflect the degree to which local healthcare providers are utilizing best practices, embracing technology, and addressing the holistic needs of their patients. The final assessment will be based on the available data and a thorough understanding of the local healthcare landscape.

This analysis provides a framework for understanding the asthma care landscape in 27871. The actual score will be influenced by the data collected, the weighting of the different factors, and the subjective interpretation of the information. This analysis is a starting point for improving asthma care in the area, by identifying areas for improvement and highlighting best practices.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape, including physician locations, clinic accessibility, and demographics, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a spatial representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare resources available in ZIP code 27871 and the surrounding areas.