The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27941, Harbinger, North Carolina is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.78 percent of the residents in 27941 has some form of health insurance. 60.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27941 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 28 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 25 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27941. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 176 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 851 health care providers accessible to residents in 27941, Harbinger, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27941, Harbinger, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 40 |
---|---|
People Score | 78 |
Provider Score | 21 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 15 |
27941 | Harbinger | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Harbinger, NC (ZIP Code 27941)
Analyzing the healthcare landscape for asthma management in Harbinger, North Carolina (ZIP Code 27941) requires a multifaceted approach. We need to assess the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of asthma-specific care, the integration of telehealth, and the accessibility of mental health resources, all while considering the physician-to-patient ratio. This analysis will culminate in a hypothetical "Asthma Score" ranking, providing a snapshot of the community's preparedness to address this chronic respiratory condition.
The foundation of asthma care rests upon accessible primary care. In Harbinger, determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau can be cross-referenced to estimate this ratio. A low ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, could indicate potential challenges in securing timely appointments for asthma management, including initial diagnoses, routine check-ups, and urgent care needs. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians is important. Are they clustered in a single location, or are they spread throughout the community, enhancing accessibility for residents in different areas of Harbinger? The location of practices relative to public transportation routes and the availability of parking also play a role in determining ease of access for patients.
Identifying standout practices within the 27941 ZIP code is vital. These practices would likely exhibit characteristics that contribute to superior asthma care. This could include employing board-certified pulmonologists or allergists, or having registered respiratory therapists on staff. Practices that adhere to national guidelines for asthma management, such as those set by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), would likely be considered top-tier. They would likely have dedicated asthma education programs, offering patients comprehensive training on medication use, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans.
Telemedicine has become an increasingly important tool in healthcare, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in Harbinger is a key factor in our Asthma Score analysis. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of peak flow meters, and online patient portals demonstrate a commitment to providing accessible and convenient care. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients who live in rural areas, have mobility issues, or struggle to take time off from work for appointments.
Asthma is not only a physical ailment; it can significantly impact a patient’s mental health. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, often exacerbating symptoms and hindering effective management. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a critical component of our analysis. This includes assessing the presence of mental health professionals (therapists, counselors, psychiatrists) who specialize in treating patients with chronic illnesses. Are these resources readily accessible, affordable, and integrated with primary care practices? Collaborative care models, where primary care physicians and mental health providers work together, have been shown to improve outcomes for patients with both asthma and mental health conditions.
Furthermore, the availability of support groups and educational programs for asthma patients and their families is essential. These resources provide a platform for sharing experiences, learning coping strategies, and gaining valuable information about asthma management. Community health organizations, hospitals, and local libraries often host these types of programs.
To generate the "Asthma Score," we would assign weighted values to each of the factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialists, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability would all contribute to the final score. A higher score would indicate a more favorable healthcare environment for asthma management, while a lower score would signal areas where improvements are needed.
In practice, the creation of this score would require extensive data gathering and analysis. We would need to consult with local healthcare providers, review public health records, and potentially conduct patient surveys to gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Harbinger. The final score would be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ongoing efforts of the community to improve asthma care.
The analysis could also extend to assessing the local environment. Air quality data, pollen counts, and the prevalence of common asthma triggers in the area would be considered. This information would provide a more holistic view of the challenges faced by asthma patients in Harbinger.
The "Asthma Score" would be a useful tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It could help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare, guide healthcare providers in identifying areas for improvement, and inform policymakers about resource allocation and public health initiatives.
The availability of data is paramount for this type of analysis. Access to detailed information about healthcare provider locations, patient demographics, and health outcomes is crucial for generating an accurate and meaningful "Asthma Score." The ability to visualize this data geographically, identifying areas of high and low access to care, is also incredibly valuable.
To fully grasp the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and the potential impact on asthma patients in Harbinger, we encourage you to explore the power of geospatial analysis. Consider using CartoChrome maps to visualize the data discussed, gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape, and identify opportunities for improvement. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful way to see the data, identify patterns, and make informed decisions about asthma care in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like