27949, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 27949, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.05 percent of the residents in 27949 has some form of health insurance. 31.23 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27949 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,443 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 25 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27949. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,251 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 846 health care providers accessible to residents in 27949, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Kitty Hawk, NC (ZIP Code 27949)

Analyzing the healthcare landscape in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina (ZIP code 27949) necessitates a deep dive into the availability and quality of primary care, especially concerning asthma management. Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, requires consistent monitoring and readily accessible medical support. This analysis will assess the "Asthma Score" for doctors within the specified ZIP code, considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, concluding with a call to action for enhanced geographical visualization.

The foundation of asthma care hinges on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Kitty Hawk, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial asthma treatment and exacerbating symptoms. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. Publicly available data, combined with local healthcare directories, is essential to accurately determine this ratio. This data must be frequently updated to account for physician turnover, relocation, and changes in practice capacity.

The quality of asthma care extends beyond mere physician availability. The practices themselves play a significant role. Standout practices will demonstrate a commitment to asthma-specific protocols. This includes readily available peak flow meters, detailed asthma action plans tailored to individual patients, and a proactive approach to identifying and managing asthma triggers. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs and community outreach initiatives would also score highly. Furthermore, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) is crucial for efficient data management, medication tracking, and communication between specialists and patients.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online prescription refills can significantly improve patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and minimizing travel time. The "Asthma Score" should reflect the extent to which practices leverage telemedicine technologies to enhance patient care.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these conditions can significantly impact asthma control. Practices that recognize this connection and integrate mental health resources into their care model will receive a higher "Asthma Score." This could involve partnerships with mental health professionals, on-site counseling services, or the use of validated screening tools to identify patients who may benefit from mental health support. A holistic approach that addresses both the physical and psychological aspects of the disease is vital for optimal patient outcomes.

Specific practice examples within Kitty Hawk are crucial for this analysis. Identifying the practices that excel in asthma management requires a combination of public data, patient reviews, and potentially, direct inquiries. For instance, a practice that consistently receives positive feedback for its asthma education programs, its responsiveness to patient concerns, and its integration of telemedicine would score highly. Conversely, a practice with long wait times, limited access to specialists, and a lack of mental health support would receive a lower score.

The "Asthma Score" for each practice should be a composite measure, reflecting all the factors discussed above. It should be transparent, objective, and easily understandable for patients. The score could be presented on a scale, with clear benchmarks for each component (physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources). This allows for a comparative analysis, enabling patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

Furthermore, the analysis must consider the specific demographics of Kitty Hawk. The prevalence of asthma can vary based on age, socioeconomic status, and environmental factors. The "Asthma Score" should be contextualized within these demographic considerations, ensuring that the assessment accurately reflects the needs of the community.

The overall primary care availability in Kitty Hawk, NC, is a dynamic situation. Constant monitoring and re-evaluation of the "Asthma Score" is essential. The healthcare landscape is always evolving, with new practices opening, existing practices adapting to new technologies, and evolving patient needs. This continuous assessment is crucial to ensure that patients have access to the best possible asthma care.

The analysis should also address potential gaps in care. Are there areas within Kitty Hawk where access to primary care is limited? Are there specific populations that are underserved? Identifying these gaps is crucial for informing healthcare planning and resource allocation. This could involve collaborating with local health authorities, community organizations, and patient advocacy groups.

In conclusion, evaluating the "Asthma Score" for doctors in Kitty Hawk (ZIP code 27949) requires a comprehensive approach. It necessitates a detailed assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The resulting score should be transparent, objective, and tailored to the specific needs of the community. The data should be continuously updated. This analysis will empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and inform healthcare providers about areas of improvement.

To visualize the geographical distribution of these healthcare resources and to gain a deeper understanding of the accessibility of asthma care in Kitty Hawk, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually represent physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, allowing for a more intuitive and comprehensive analysis of the healthcare landscape.