28001, Albemarle, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28001, Albemarle, North Carolina is 75 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.70 percent of the residents in 28001 has some form of health insurance. 42.39 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.54 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28001 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 5,893 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28001. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,308 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,033 health care providers accessible to residents in 28001, Albemarle, North Carolina.

Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28001 and Primary Care Availability in Albemarle

Analyzing healthcare accessibility, particularly for conditions like asthma, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on doctors within ZIP code 28001 and the broader primary care landscape of Albemarle, North Carolina, evaluating factors crucial to patient care, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This assessment aims to provide a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.

The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of access. In Albemarle and the 28001 ZIP code, the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts the ability of asthma patients to receive timely diagnoses, treatment, and ongoing management. A higher ratio, meaning more patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial interventions and exacerbating asthma symptoms. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility and the potential for more personalized care. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau, when combined, can provide an estimate of this ratio. However, it is important to note that these ratios are dynamic and can fluctuate based on physician retirements, new arrivals, and population shifts. Therefore, regular monitoring is essential.

Standout practices within the region often demonstrate superior patient care, potentially influencing the overall ‘Asthma Score.’ These practices may be identified through patient reviews, quality metrics reported to organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and the presence of specialized asthma clinics or programs. Characteristics of these standout practices include a focus on patient education, proactive asthma management plans, and the integration of multidisciplinary care teams. The availability of certified asthma educators, respiratory therapists, and behavioral health specialists within a practice can significantly improve patient outcomes. Identifying these high-performing practices and understanding their operational models can provide valuable insights for improving asthma care across the broader community.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows patients to remotely consult with their physicians, monitor their symptoms, and receive medication refills. This can be particularly beneficial for patients living in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The ‘Asthma Score’ analysis must consider the extent of telemedicine integration within practices in 28001 and Albemarle. Factors to evaluate include the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the patient’s access to reliable internet connectivity. Practices that embrace telemedicine can significantly improve patient access to care, reduce the frequency of in-person visits, and enhance the overall management of asthma.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms, while the chronic nature of asthma can contribute to mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score.’ This analysis needs to evaluate the integration of mental health services within primary care practices in the area. Do practices have on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health providers? Are there referral pathways for patients needing mental health support? The presence of these resources demonstrates a commitment to holistic patient care and can significantly improve asthma outcomes.

Assessing the ‘Asthma Score’ also requires a look at the availability of specialized asthma care. Are there pulmonologists or allergists in the area? Access to these specialists is crucial for patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma. The distance to these specialists and the wait times for appointments are important considerations. The presence of specialized asthma clinics or programs that offer comprehensive asthma education and management can also positively impact the score.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence asthma outcomes. Poverty, housing conditions, and environmental factors can all impact asthma prevalence and severity. Data on these factors, such as the percentage of families living below the poverty line and the quality of housing stock, can be used to contextualize the ‘Asthma Score’ and identify areas where interventions are most needed.

Finally, the analysis should evaluate the availability of asthma education programs and resources for patients. These programs can empower patients to better manage their condition, recognize triggers, and take appropriate action when symptoms worsen. The presence of these resources, whether offered by healthcare providers, community organizations, or schools, can significantly improve patient outcomes.

In conclusion, the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis for doctors in ZIP code 28001 and primary care availability in Albemarle requires a comprehensive assessment of multiple factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and socioeconomic considerations. This analysis provides a framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of asthma care in the region, highlighting areas of strength and weakness. This type of analysis can be greatly enhanced by the visualization capabilities of mapping tools.

For a more detailed and visually engaging understanding of the healthcare landscape in Albemarle and surrounding areas, including the distribution of healthcare providers, patient demographics, and other relevant data, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps.