28086, Kings Mountain, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28086, Kings Mountain, North Carolina is 53 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.10 percent of the residents in 28086 has some form of health insurance. 41.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28086 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,123 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28086. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,396 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,447 health care providers accessible to residents in 28086, Kings Mountain, North Carolina.

The evaluation of asthma care within ZIP code 28086, encompassing Kings Mountain, requires a multi-faceted approach. We will analyze the availability of primary care physicians, their capacity to manage asthma, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' assessment. This analysis aims to provide a clear picture of the local healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers and offer actionable insights.

The cornerstone of asthma management lies in accessible primary care. Kings Mountain's physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. Determining the exact ratio necessitates data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed care for asthma exacerbations. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater access to care. The availability of primary care physicians specifically trained in asthma management, or those with a demonstrated interest in respiratory health, is also paramount.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. We must consider factors such as the number of board-certified allergists and pulmonologists practicing within the ZIP code. Practices that proactively manage asthma, offering comprehensive patient education, individualized asthma action plans, and regular follow-up appointments, deserve recognition. Moreover, practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives, tracking asthma control rates and patient outcomes, demonstrate a commitment to excellence.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in asthma management, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and patient education. The adoption rate of telemedicine by primary care practices in Kings Mountain is a key indicator. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of peak flow meters, and online access to patient portals are likely to provide more convenient and accessible care. This is especially important for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas.

The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. The availability of mental health resources within primary care practices, or through referrals to local mental health providers, is therefore crucial. Practices that screen patients for mental health concerns and offer integrated care models demonstrate a holistic approach to asthma management.

To formulate an 'Asthma Score,' we need to weigh these factors. A higher score would reflect a robust healthcare system with a high physician-to-patient ratio, a significant number of asthma specialists, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. Conversely, a lower score would indicate potential challenges in accessing timely and comprehensive asthma care.

The 'Asthma Score' is not a static metric. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. For instance, the opening of a new primary care clinic, the expansion of telemedicine services, or the integration of mental health services would likely increase the score. Conversely, physician retirements or a lack of investment in asthma-specific resources could lead to a decrease.

Specific data points are crucial. The precise number of primary care physicians, allergists, and pulmonologists within 28086 needs to be established. The percentage of practices offering telemedicine services, the types of telemedicine modalities used (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), and the availability of mental health services within those practices must be determined. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, would provide valuable insights into the quality of care.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socioeconomic demographics of the area. Asthma disproportionately affects certain populations, such as low-income individuals and minority groups. The 'Asthma Score' should be adjusted to account for any disparities in access to care based on these factors. This ensures a fair and accurate assessment of the healthcare landscape.

The assessment should also consider the availability of asthma-specific resources, such as asthma education programs, support groups, and community outreach initiatives. Practices that actively participate in these programs demonstrate a commitment to patient empowerment and community health. The presence of these resources would contribute positively to the 'Asthma Score.'

The complexity of asthma management necessitates a collaborative approach. Primary care physicians, specialists, mental health professionals, and other healthcare providers must work together to provide comprehensive care. The 'Asthma Score' should reflect the level of collaboration and communication among these providers. Practices that actively participate in care coordination initiatives are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.

In conclusion, evaluating the quality of asthma care in Kings Mountain requires a thorough examination of physician availability, specialist presence, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration. The 'Asthma Score' serves as a valuable tool for assessing the healthcare landscape and identifying areas for improvement. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, we can work towards ensuring that all asthma sufferers in Kings Mountain receive the care they need to live healthy and fulfilling lives.

To further explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and population demographics, we encourage you to utilize CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive visualizations and data-driven insights that can enhance your understanding of the local healthcare landscape.