Asthma Score

28103, Marshville, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 28103, Marshville, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28103, Marshville, North Carolina is 22 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.24 percent of the residents in 28103 has some form of health insurance. 35.39 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.80 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28103 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,402 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28103. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,963 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,806 health care providers accessible to residents in 28103, Marshville, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 28103, Marshville, North Carolina

Asthma Score 20
People Score 26
Provider Score 22
Hospital Score 47
Travel Score 51

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

28103 Marshville North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 28103, Marshville, North Carolina

The Asthma Score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 28103, specifically Marshville, North Carolina, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers several crucial factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in managing asthma effectively.

Marshville, a small town, presents unique challenges and opportunities. The availability of primary care physicians is a foundational element. A low physician-to-patient ratio indicates a potential strain on resources, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially hindering proactive asthma management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, allowing for more frequent check-ups and quicker intervention during asthma exacerbations. Researching the current physician-to-patient ratio within 28103 is the initial step. Public health data, county health department reports, and information from medical associations can provide this critical baseline.

Standout practices are those that demonstrate excellence in asthma care. These practices often employ specialized staff, such as certified asthma educators or respiratory therapists, who can provide comprehensive patient education and support. They may also have advanced diagnostic capabilities, like spirometry testing, readily available. Identifying these practices requires a review of online patient reviews, assessments from professional organizations, and recommendations from other healthcare providers. These practices often participate in asthma-focused research or community outreach programs, further demonstrating their commitment to asthma management.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, offering convenience and reducing the need for travel. This is particularly beneficial for asthma patients, who may need regular check-ins or quick consultations to manage their condition. Practices that embrace telemedicine often utilize secure video conferencing platforms and patient portals, facilitating easy communication and access to medical records. The availability of telemedicine within 28103 is a crucial factor in assessing the overall Asthma Score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma care, but they are essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care model demonstrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. This may involve offering on-site counseling, referrals to mental health specialists, or incorporating mental health screenings into routine check-ups. The presence and accessibility of these resources are critical indicators of a practice's commitment to comprehensive asthma care.

The analysis should also consider the specific needs of the Marshville population. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and environmental conditions can significantly impact asthma management. Practices that tailor their services to address these unique challenges are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes. This may involve offering flexible appointment scheduling, providing financial assistance for medication, or educating patients about environmental triggers.

The Asthma Score, therefore, is not a single number but a composite assessment. It reflects the availability and quality of various resources, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health services. To determine the score, each factor should be weighted based on its relative importance. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted more heavily than the availability of a specific piece of diagnostic equipment.

Data collection is crucial for accurate analysis. This involves gathering information from various sources, including public health agencies, medical practices, patient surveys, and online reviews. Each data point should be carefully verified to ensure accuracy. Analyzing the data requires a systematic approach, using statistical methods to identify trends and patterns. This analysis can then be used to generate a comprehensive Asthma Score for the doctors in ZIP Code 28103.

The analysis should also identify areas for improvement. Are there gaps in care? Are there underserved populations? Are there opportunities to improve telemedicine adoption or mental health integration? This information can be used to develop targeted interventions aimed at improving asthma management in Marshville.

The final Asthma Score analysis should be presented in a clear and concise manner. It should include a summary of the findings, a detailed breakdown of the methodology, and specific recommendations for improvement. The analysis should also be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare practices and patient needs. This ensures that the Asthma Score remains a relevant and valuable tool for improving asthma care in Marshville.

The Asthma Score should also consider the impact of environmental factors. Marshville, like any town, is susceptible to air quality issues. The analysis should account for local air quality data, including levels of pollutants that can trigger asthma attacks. This may involve incorporating data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or local air quality monitoring stations. Practices that educate patients about environmental triggers and provide guidance on how to mitigate their effects are demonstrating a proactive approach to asthma management.

Furthermore, the analysis should examine the availability of asthma medications. This includes both prescription medications and over-the-counter remedies. The analysis should assess whether patients have access to affordable medications and whether practices offer assistance programs for those who cannot afford their medications. The ease of obtaining refills and the availability of medication education are also important considerations.

The Asthma Score should also consider the role of patient education. Practices that provide comprehensive asthma education programs are more likely to empower patients to manage their condition effectively. This may involve teaching patients about their medications, triggers, and how to recognize and respond to asthma exacerbations. The analysis should assess the availability of these programs and their effectiveness.

Finally, the Asthma Score analysis should be presented in a user-friendly format. This may involve creating an interactive dashboard or a visual representation of the data. The goal is to make the information accessible to healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers. This will facilitate informed decision-making and promote collaboration in improving asthma care in Marshville.

To gain a comprehensive geographic understanding of healthcare access, including physician locations, practice specializations, and potential areas of need within Marshville and beyond, explore the power of data visualization. CartoChrome maps can transform complex healthcare data into easily understandable visual representations, allowing for a deeper understanding of the landscape.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 28103, Marshville, North Carolina

You may also like

28133, Peachland, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 5.55 Miles

Total Population:

28135, Polkton, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 9.41 Miles

Total Population:

28110, Monroe, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 13.41 Miles

Total Population:

28112, Monroe, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 13.63 Miles

Total Population:

28079, Indian Trail, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 15.86 Miles

Total Population:

28129, Oakboro, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 17.08 Miles

Total Population:

28108, Mineral Springs, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 17.12 Miles

Total Population:

28104, Matthews, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 19.04 Miles

Total Population:

28107, Midland, North Carolina
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 28103: 19.52 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 28103, Marshville, North Carolina