The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28305, Fayetteville, North Carolina is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.00 percent of the residents in 28305 has some form of health insurance. 37.86 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28305 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,161 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28305. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,342 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,612 health care providers accessible to residents in 28305, Fayetteville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28305, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 71 |
---|---|
People Score | 60 |
Provider Score | 57 |
Hospital Score | 43 |
Travel Score | 63 |
28305 | Fayetteville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will focus on providing a comprehensive understanding of asthma care within the 28305 ZIP code, specifically examining the availability and quality of primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, culminating in a call to action for a mapping tool.
The 28305 ZIP code encompasses a significant portion of Fayetteville, North Carolina, a city with a diverse population and a known prevalence of respiratory conditions, including asthma. Assessing the quality of asthma care requires a multi-faceted approach, looking beyond the simple presence of physicians to consider the accessibility, the resources available, and the integration of comprehensive care. This analysis will attempt to provide a snapshot of the current landscape, acknowledging the inherent complexities of data collection and interpretation.
Primary care availability forms the foundation of asthma management. Patients often rely on their primary care physicians (PCPs) for initial diagnosis, ongoing monitoring, and medication management. In Fayetteville, the density of PCPs within the 28305 ZIP code is a critical factor. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, decreased access to care, and potentially, poorer asthma control. Data on this ratio is essential, including the number of practicing PCPs, the total population within the ZIP code, and the average patient load per physician. Furthermore, the types of primary care practices present, such as solo practices, group practices, and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), will impact the level of resources available and the ability to coordinate care effectively.
Standout practices within the 28305 ZIP code, if any, deserve special attention. These practices might be recognized for their asthma-specific programs, their commitment to patient education, their use of evidence-based guidelines, or their high patient satisfaction scores. Identifying these practices and understanding their operational models can offer valuable insights into best practices. Factors to consider include the availability of certified asthma educators, the use of spirometry testing in the office, the implementation of asthma action plans, and the integration of patient self-management strategies. Publicly available data on patient outcomes, such as asthma exacerbation rates and hospital readmission rates, would further inform the assessment of practice effectiveness.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve asthma care access, particularly for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those living in underserved areas. Evaluating the extent of telemedicine use among primary care practices within the 28305 ZIP code is crucial. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring tools, and the use of digital platforms for patient education and medication refills. The success of telemedicine initiatives depends on several factors, including the availability of reliable internet access, the patient’s comfort with technology, and the integration of telemedicine into the existing workflow of the practice.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling and support groups, within the 28305 ZIP code is therefore essential. Assessing the integration of mental health services within primary care practices, the availability of referrals to mental health specialists, and the awareness of the connection between asthma and mental health among healthcare providers are all important considerations.
Physician-to-patient ratios are more than just a number; they represent the potential burden on the existing medical infrastructure. A high ratio, meaning fewer physicians for a larger population, often leads to longer wait times for appointments, making it harder for patients to receive timely care. This can be especially problematic for asthma patients, who require regular check-ups and prompt attention to changes in their condition. The impact of this ratio is compounded by the socioeconomic makeup of the area, which can affect access to care.
The success of asthma management hinges on a collaborative approach. This means effective communication and coordination between the patient, the primary care physician, any specialists involved (such as pulmonologists or allergists), and other healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists and respiratory therapists. The level of coordination between these providers can be assessed by looking at the use of electronic health records (EHRs), the sharing of patient information, and the implementation of care pathways.
The data needed for a comprehensive asthma score analysis is complex and may not always be readily available. Information on physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would need to be gathered from a variety of sources, including publicly available databases, healthcare provider websites, and potentially, surveys of healthcare professionals and patients. Furthermore, the analysis should consider demographic factors, such as age, race, and socioeconomic status, as these factors can significantly influence asthma prevalence and access to care.
The 28305 ZIP code's asthma care landscape is a dynamic one. The analysis should be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare environment, such as the opening or closing of practices, the adoption of new technologies, and the availability of new resources. This will ensure that the assessment remains relevant and useful for both healthcare providers and patients.
By integrating data from various sources, analyzing key metrics, and considering the complexities of the healthcare landscape, a more complete picture of asthma care in the 28305 ZIP code can be developed. This detailed analysis can help identify areas of strength and weakness, guide improvements in care delivery, and ultimately, improve outcomes for individuals living with asthma.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Fayetteville and the 28305 ZIP code, including the locations of primary care practices, specialists, pharmacies, and mental health resources, and to visualize the data discussed in this analysis, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a spatial representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the distribution of healthcare resources and the accessibility of care for asthma patients.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like